Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
But as it is in mockery that Celsus says we speak of “God coming down
like a torturer bearing fire,” and thus compels us unseasonably to
investigate words of deeper meaning, we shall make a few remarks,
sufficient to enable our hearers to form an idea[517] of the defence
which disposes of the ridicule of Celsus against us, and then we shall
turn to what follows. The divine word says that our God is “a consuming
fire,”[518] and that “He draws rivers of fire before Him;”[519] nay,
that He even entereth in as “a refiner’s fire, and as a fuller’s
herb,”[520] to purify His own people. But when He is said to be a
“consuming fire,” we inquire what are the things which are appropriate
to be consumed by God. And we assert that they are wickedness, and the
works which result from it, and which, being figuratively called “wood,
hay, stubble,”[521] God consumes as a fire. The wicked man, accordingly,
is said to build up on the previously-laid foundation of reason, “wood,
and hay, and stubble.” If, then, any one can show that these words were
differently understood by the writer, and can prove that the wicked man
_literally_[522] builds up “wood, or hay, or stubble,” it is evident
that the fire must be understood to be material, and an object of sense.
But if, on the contrary, the works of the wicked man are spoken of
_figuratively_ under the names of “wood, or hay, or stubble,” why does
it not at once occur [to inquire] in what sense the word “fire” is to be
taken, so that “wood” of such a kind should be consumed? for [the
Scripture] says: “The fire will try each man’s work of what sort it is.
If any man’s work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive
a reward. If any man’s work be burned, he shall suffer loss.”[523] But
what work can be spoken of in these words as being “burned,” save all
that results from wickedness? Therefore our God is a “consuming fire” in
the sense in which we have taken the word; and thus He enters in as a
“refiner’s fire,” to refine the rational nature, which has been filled
with the lead of wickedness, and to free it from the other impure
materials, which adulterate the natural gold or silver, so to speak, of
the soul.[524] And, in like manner, “rivers of fire” are said to be
before God, who will thoroughly cleanse away the evil which is
intermingled throughout the whole soul. But these remarks are sufficient
in answer to the assertion, “that thus they were made to give expression
to the erroneous opinion that God will come down bearing fire like a
torturer.”
Footnote 517:
γεῦσαι.
Footnote 518:
Cf. Deut. iv. 24, ix. 3.
Footnote 519:
Cf. Dan. vii. 10.
Footnote 520:
Cf. Mal. iii. 2.
Footnote 521:
Cf. 1 Cor. iii. 12.
Footnote 522:
σωματικῶς.
Footnote 523:
Cf. 1 Cor. iii. 13-15.
Footnote 524:
τὴν τοῦ χρυσοῦ (ἵν’ οὕτως ὀνομάσω), φύσιν τῆς ψυχῆς, ἢ τὴν ἀργύρου,
δολωσάντων.
Chapter XIV.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account