Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
Cf. 1 Cor. x. 3, 4.
Footnote 695:
προβλήματα καὶ παραβολαί.
Footnote 696:
Cf. Ps. lxxxvii. 1, 2.
Chapter L.
Moreover, if the law of Moses had contained nothing which was to be
understood as having a secret meaning, the prophet would not have said
in his prayer to God, “Open Thou mine eyes, and I will behold wondrous
things out of Thy law;”[697] whereas he knew that there was a veil of
ignorance lying upon the heart of those who read but do not understand
the figurative meaning, which veil is taken away by the gift of God,
when He hears him who has done all that he can,[698] and who by reason
of habit has his senses exercised to distinguish between good and evil,
and who continually utters the prayer, “Open Thou mine eyes, and I will
behold wondrous things out of Thy law.” And who is there that, on
reading of the dragon that lives in the Egyptian river,[699] and of the
fishes which lurk in his scales, or of the excrement of Pharaoh which
fills the mountains of Egypt,[700] is not led at once to inquire who he
is that fills the Egyptian mountains with his stinking excrement, and
what the Egyptian mountains are; and what the rivers in Egypt are, of
which the aforesaid Pharaoh boastfully says, “The rivers are mine, and I
have made them;”[701] and who the dragon is, and the fishes in its
scales,—and this so as to harmonize with the interpretation to be given
of the rivers? But why establish at greater length what needs no
demonstration? For to these things applies the saying: “Who is wise, and
he shall understand these things? or who is prudent, and he shall know
them?”[702] Now I have gone at some length into the subject, because I
wished to show the unsoundness of the assertion of Celsus, that “the
more modest among the Jews and Christians endeavour somehow to give
these stories an allegorical signification, although some of them do not
admit of this, but on the contrary are exceedingly silly inventions.”
Much rather are the stories of the Greeks not only very silly, but very
impious inventions. For our narratives keep expressly in view the
multitude of simpler believers, which was not done by those who invented
the Grecian fables. And therefore not without propriety does Plato expel
from his state all fables and poems of such a nature as those of which
we have been speaking.
Footnote 697:
Cf. Ps. cxix. 18.
Footnote 698:
ἐπὰν ἐπακούσῃ τοῦ παρ’ ἑαυτοῦ πάντα ποιήσαντος.
Footnote 699:
Cf. Ezek. xxix. 3.
Footnote 700:
Cf. Ezek. xxxii. 6.
Footnote 701:
Cf. Ezek. xxix. 3.
Footnote 702:
Cf. Hos. xiv. 9.
Chapter LI.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account