Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
For which reason, whatever else there may be in the writings of Moses
which excites my wonder, I would say that the following is worthy of
admiration, viz. that Moses, having observed the varying natures of
animals, and having either learned from God what was peculiar to them,
and to the demons which are kindred to each of the animals, or having
himself ascertained these things by his own wisdom, has, in arranging
the different kinds of animals, pronounced all those which are supposed
by the Egyptians and the rest of mankind to possess the power of
divination to be unclean, and, as a general rule, all that are not of
that class to be clean. And amongst the unclean animals mentioned by
Moses are the wolf, and fox, and serpent, and eagle, and hawk, and such
like. And, generally speaking, you will find that not only in the law,
but also in the prophets, these animals are employed as examples of all
that is most wicked; and that a wolf or a fox is never mentioned for a
good purpose. Each species of demon, consequently, would seem to possess
a certain affinity with a certain species of animal. And as among men
there are some who are stronger than others, and this not at all owing
to their moral character, so, in the same way, some demons will be more
powerful in things indifferent than others;[823] and one class of them
employs one kind of animal for the purpose of deluding men, in
accordance with the will of him who is called in our Scriptures the
“prince of this world,” while others predict future events by means of
another kind of animal. Observe, moreover, to what a pitch of wickedness
the demons proceed, so that they even assume the bodies of weasels in
order to reveal the future! And now, consider with yourself whether it
is better to accept the belief that it is the Supreme God and His Son
who stir up the birds and the other living creatures to divination, or
that those who stir up these creatures, and not human beings (although
they are present before them), are wicked, and, as they are called by
our Scriptures, unclean demons.
Footnote 823:
ἐν μέσοις.
Chapter XCIV.
But if the soul of birds is to be esteemed divine because future events
are predicted by them, why should we not rather maintain, that when
omens[824] are accepted by men, the souls of those are divine through
which the omens are heard? Accordingly, among such would be ranked the
female slave mentioned in Homer, who ground the corn, when she said
regarding the suitors:
“For the very last time, now, will they sup here.”[825]
This slave, then, was divine, while the great Ulysses, the friend of
Homer’s Pallas Athene, was _not_ divine, but understanding the words
spoken by this “divine” grinder of corn as an omen, rejoiced, as the
poet says:
“The divine Ulysses rejoiced at the omen.”[826]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account