Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
I have power to lay it down, and I have
power to take it again.”[87] And perhaps it was on this account that He
hastened His departure from the body, that He might preserve it, and
that His legs might not be broken, as were those of the robbers who were
crucified with Him. “For the soldiers broke the legs of the first, and
of the other who was crucified with Him; but when they came to Jesus,
and saw that He was dead, they brake not His legs.”[88] We have
accordingly answered the question, “How is it credible that Jesus could
have predicted these things?” And with respect to this, “How could the
dead man be immortal?” let him who wishes to understand know, that it is
not the dead man who is immortal, but He who rose from the dead. So far,
indeed, was the dead man from being immortal, that even the Jesus before
His decease—the compound being, who was to suffer death—was not
immortal.[89] For no one is immortal who is destined to die; but he is
immortal when he shall no longer be subject to death. But “Christ, being
raised from the dead, dieth no more: death hath no more dominion over
Him;”[90] although those may be unwilling to admit this who cannot
understand how such things should be said.
Footnote 84:
ὅσα περὶ τούτου καὶ παρὰ τῷ Παύλῳ πεφιλοσόφηται.
Footnote 85:
Cf. Plato, _de Rep._ x.
Footnote 86:
Cf. Plin. _Nat. Hist._ vii. c. 52.
Footnote 87:
John x. 18.
Footnote 88:
John xix. 52.
Footnote 89:
Οὐ μόνον οὖν οὐχ ὁ νεκρὸς ἀθάνατος, ἀλλ’ οὐδ’ ὁ πρὸ τοῦ νεκροῦ Ἰησοῦς
ὁ σύνθετος ἀθάνατος ἦν, ὅς γε ἔμελλε τεθνήξεσθαι.
Footnote 90:
Rom. vi. 9.
Chapter XVII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account