Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
Celsus next addresses to us the following remark: “You will not, I
suppose, say of him, that, after failing to gain over those who were in
this world, he went to Hades to gain over those who were there.” But
whether he like it or not, we assert that not only while Jesus was in
the body did He win over not a few persons merely, but so great a
number, that a conspiracy was formed against Him on account of the
multitude of His followers; but also, that when He became a soul,
without the covering of the body, He dwelt among those souls which were
without bodily covering, converting such of them as were willing to
Himself, or those whom He saw, for reasons known to Him alone, to be
better adapted to such a course.
Chapter XLIV.
Celsus in the next place says, with indescribable silliness: “If, after
inventing defences which are absurd, and by which ye were ridiculously
deluded, ye imagine that you really make a good defence, what prevents
you from regarding those other individuals who have been condemned, and
have died a miserable death, as greater and more divine messengers of
heaven [than Jesus]?” Now, that manifestly and clearly there is no
similarity between Jesus, who suffered what is described, and those who
have died a wretched death on account of their sorcery, or whatever else
be the charge against them, is patent to every one. For no one can point
to any acts of a sorcerer which turned away souls from the practice of
the many sins which prevail among men, and from the flood of wickedness
(in the world).[130] But since this Jew of Celsus compares Him to
robbers, and says that “any similarly shameless fellow might be able to
say regarding even a robber and murderer whom punishment had overtaken,
that such an one was not a robber, but a god, because he predicted to
his fellow-robbers that he would suffer such punishment as he actually
did suffer,” it might, in the first place, be answered, that it is not
because He predicted that He would suffer such things that we entertain
those opinions regarding Jesus which lead us to have confidence in Him,
as one who has come down to us from God. And, in the second place, we
assert that this very comparison[131] has been somehow foretold in the
Gospels; since God was numbered with the transgressors by wicked men,
who desired rather a “murderer” (one who for sedition and murder had
been cast into prison) to be released unto them, and Jesus to be
crucified, and who crucified Him between two robbers. Jesus, indeed, is
ever crucified with robbers among His genuine disciples and witnesses to
the truth, and suffers the same condemnation which they do among men.
And we say, that if those persons have any resemblance to robbers, who
on account of their piety towards God suffer all kinds of injury and
death, that they may keep it pure and unstained, according to the
teaching of Jesus, then it is clear also that Jesus, the author of such
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account