Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
But since the Jew says that these histories of the alleged descent of
heroes to Hades, and of their return thence, are juggling
impositions,[160] maintaining that these heroes disappeared for a
certain time, and secretly withdrew themselves from the sight of all
men, and gave themselves out afterwards as having returned from
Hades,—for such is the meaning which his words seem to convey respecting
the Odrysian Orpheus, and the Thessalian Protesilaus, and the Tænarian
Hercules, and Theseus also,—let us endeavour to show that the account of
Jesus being raised from the dead cannot possibly be compared to these.
For each one of the heroes respectively mentioned might, had he wished,
have secretly withdrawn himself from the sight of men, and returned
again, if so determined, to those whom he had left; but seeing that
Jesus was crucified before all the Jews, and His body slain in the
presence of His nation, how can they bring themselves to say that He
practised a similar deception[161] with those heroes who are related to
have gone down to Hades, and to have returned thence? But we say that
the following consideration might be adduced, perhaps, as a defence of
the public crucifixion of Jesus, especially in connection with the
existence of those stories of heroes who are supposed to have been
compelled[162] to descend to Hades: that if we were to suppose Jesus to
have died an obscure death, so that the fact of His decease was not
patent to the whole nation of the Jews, and afterwards to have actually
risen from the dead, there would, in such a case, have been ground for
the same suspicion entertained regarding the heroes being also
entertained regarding Himself. Probably, then, in addition to other
causes for the crucifixion of Jesus, this also may have contributed to
His dying a conspicuous death upon the cross, that no one might have it
in his power to say that He voluntarily withdrew from the sight of men,
and seemed only to die, without really doing so; but, appearing again,
made a juggler’s trick[163] of the resurrection from the dead. But a
clear and unmistakeable proof of the fact I hold to be the undertaking
of His disciples, who devoted themselves to the teaching of a doctrine
which was attended with danger to human life,—a doctrine which they
would not have taught with such courage had they invented the
resurrection of Jesus from the dead; and who also, at the same time, not
only prepared others to despise death, but were themselves the first to
manifest their disregard for its terrors.
Footnote 160:
τερατείας.
Footnote 161:
πῶς οἴονται τὸ παραπλήσιον πλάσασθαι λέγειν αὐτὸν τοῖς ἰστορουμένοις,
etc.
Footnote 162:
καταβεβηκέναι βιᾷ. Bohereau proposes the omission of βιᾷ.
Footnote 163:
ἐτερατεύσατο.
Chapter LVII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account