Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
After these points, Celsus proceeds to bring against the Gospel
narrative a charge which is not to be lightly passed over, saying that
“if Jesus desired to show that his power was really divine, he ought to
have appeared to those who had ill-treated him, and to him who had
condemned him, and to all men universally.” For it appears to us also to
be true, according to the Gospel account, that He was not seen after His
resurrection in the same manner as He used formerly to show
Himself—publicly, and to all men. But it is recorded in the Acts, that
“being seen during forty days,” He expounded to His disciples “the
things pertaining to the kingdom of God.”[178] And in the Gospels[179]
it is not stated that He was always with them; but that on one occasion
He appeared in their midst, after eight days, when the doors were shut,
and on another in some similar fashion. And Paul also, in the concluding
portions of the first Epistle to the Corinthians, in reference to His
not having publicly appeared as He did in the period before He suffered,
writes as follows: “For I delivered unto you first of all that which I
also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the
Scriptures; and that He was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve: after
that He was seen of above five hundred brethren at once, of whom the
greater part remain unto the present time, but some are fallen asleep.
After that He was seen of James, then of all the apostles. And last of
all He was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time.”[180] I am
of opinion now that the statements in this passage contain some great
and wonderful mysteries, which are beyond the grasp not merely of the
great multitude of ordinary believers, but even of those who are far
advanced [in Christian knowledge], and that in them the reason would be
explained why He did not show Himself, after His resurrection from the
dead, in the same manner as before that event. And in a treatise of this
nature, composed in answer to a work directed against the Christians and
their faith, observe whether we are able to adduce a few rational
arguments out of a greater number, and thus make an impression upon the
hearers of this apology.
Footnote 178:
Acts i. 3.
Footnote 179:
Cf. John xx. 26.
Footnote 180:
1 Cor. xv. 3-8.
Chapter LXIV.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account