Literally, “declaring happy.” Footnote 1452: Literally, “for the.” Footnote 1453: Literally, “boiling, and saying.” Footnote 1454: Or, “in spirit.” Footnote 1455: _i.e._ in his Epistle to the Romans. Footnote 1456: The Saturnalia were then celebrated. Footnote 1457: Literally, “they came together zealously.” Footnote 1458: The amphitheatre itself was sacred to several of the gods. Footnote 1459: Prov. x. 24. Footnote 1460: Or “deposited.” Footnote 1461: To the effect, viz., that the martyrdom of Ignatius had been acceptable to God. Footnote 1462: Literally, “the visions of the dreams.” THE EPISTLE TO DIOGNETUS. Introductory Notice. The following interesting and eloquent epistle is anonymous, and we have no clue whatever as to its author. For a considerable period after its publication in 1592, it was generally ascribed to Justin Martyr. In recent times Otto has inserted it among the works of that writer, but Semisch and others contend that it cannot possibly be his. In dealing with this question, we depend entirely upon the internal evidence, no statement as to the authorship of the epistle having descended to us from antiquity. And it can scarcely be denied that the whole tone of the epistle, as well as special passages which it contains, points to some other writer than Justin. Accordingly, critics are now for the most part agreed that it is not his, and that it must be ascribed to one who lived at a still earlier date in the history of the church. Several internal arguments have been brought forward in favour of this opinion. Supposing chap. xi. to be genuine, it has been supported by the fact that the writer there styles himself “a disciple of the apostles.” But there is great suspicion that the two concluding chapters are spurious; and even though admitted to be genuine, the expression quoted evidently admits of a different explanation from that which implies the writer’s personal acquaintance with the apostles: it might, indeed, be adopted by one even at the present day. More weight is to be attached to those passages in which the writer speaks of Christianity as still being a _new_ thing in the world. Expressions to this effect occur in several places (chap. i. ii. ix.), and seem to imply that the author lived very little, if at all, after the apostolic age. There is certainly nothing in the epistle which is inconsistent with this opinion; and we may therefore believe, that in this beautiful composition we possess a genuine production of some apostolic man who lived not later than the beginning of the second century.