The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 5 (of 9): Being His Autobiography, Correspondence, Reports, Messages, Addresses, and Other Writings, Official and PrivateJefferson, Thomas
History
The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 5 (of 9): Being His Autobiography, Correspondence, Reports, Messages, Addresses, and Other Writings, Official and Private
Jefferson, Thomas
United States -- Politics and government -- 1775-1783; United States -- Politics and government -- 1783-1865
There is no doubt but that the transaction at New Orleans, between Ortega
and the British officer with the prize sloop Guadaloupe, has been a mere
fraud, to evade our regulation against the sale of prizes in our harbors;
and his insolent letter intended merely to cover the fraud. His ready
abandonment of the vessel, and Ortega's resumption of her, are clear
proofs. Should not, or could not, process be ordered against Ortega and
the vessel? I think a copy of Reeve's letter to Governor Claiborne, and of
the proceedings of the court, might be sent to Mr. Erskine, with proper
observations on this double outrage, and an intimation that the habitual
insolence of their officers may force us to refuse them an asylum, even
when seeking it in real distress, if the boon is to be abused as it has
been by this insolent and dishonest officer. And as it is very possible
the rascal may push his impostures to the making complaint to his
government, this step with Mr. Erskine may anticipate it.
I salute you with sincere and constant affection.
TO THE SECRETARY AT WAR.
MONTICELLO, August 5, 1808.
DEAR SIR,--I enclose you a letter from the Path-killer and others of the
Cherokees, the object of which I do not precisely see. I suppose they are
of Van's party. The sentiments are unquestionably those of a white man.
Sibley's letters present a disagreeable view. It will be troublesome
if we are once compelled to use acts of force against those people. It
is the more difficult as we should have to pursue them into the country
beyond the Sabine, on which an understanding with the Spaniards would be
necessary. But what is the meaning of our not pursuing deserters over the
Rio Hondo? I thought we had so far settled that matter, as that it was
understood by the Spaniards that until a final settlement of boundary, the
Sabine was to be that to which each was to exercise jurisdiction. On the
same principles ought we not immediately to suppress this new appointment
of a Spanish Alcalde at Bayou Pierre? I ask this for information, because
I do not precisely recollect what we finally intended as to Bayou Pierre,
and I have not the papers here. I suppose the trial and punishment of the
guilty Alibamas, and Sibley's reclamations with the tribe for reparation,
will give us time till we meet to consider what is to be done. Has any and
what step been taken for the recovery of Pike's men?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account