The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 4 (1794-1796): The Age of ReasonPaine, Thomas
Religion
The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 4 (1794-1796): The Age of Reason
Paine, Thomas
Philosophy and religion; Political science; Rationalism
Ver. 15. “‘Bring me,’ (said Elisha), ‘a minstrel’; and it came to pass,
when the minstrel played, that the hand of the Lord came upon him.”
Here is the farce of the conjurer. Now for the prophecy: “And Elisha
said, [singing most probably to the tune he was playing], Thus saith
the Lord, Make this valley full of ditches;” which was just telling
them what every countryman could have told them without either fiddle
or farce, that the way to get water was to dig for it.
But as every conjuror is not famous alike for the same thing, so
neither were those prophets; for though all of them, at least those I
have spoken of, were famous for lying, some of them excelled in
cursing. Elisha, whom I have just mentioned, was a chief in this branch
of prophesying; it was he that cursed the forty-two children in the
name of the Lord, whom the two she-bears came and devoured. We are to
suppose that those children were of the party of Israel; but as those
who will curse will lie, there is just as much credit to be given to
this story of Elisha’s two she-bears as there is to that of the Dragon
of Wantley, of whom it is said:
Poor children three devoured be,
That could not with him grapple;
And at one sup he eat them up,
As a man would eat an apple.
There was another description of men called prophets, that amused
themselves with dreams and visions; but whether by night or by day we
know not. These, if they were not quite harmless, were but little
mischievous. Of this class are,
EZEKIEL and DANIEL; and the first question upon these books, as upon
all the others, is, Are they genuine? that is, were they written by
Ezekiel and Daniel?
Of this there is no proof; but so far as my own opinion goes, I am more
inclined to believe they were, than that they were not. My reasons for
this opinion are as follows: First, Because those books do not contain
internal evidence to prove they were not written by Ezekiel and Daniel,
as the books ascribed to Moses, Joshua, Samuel, etc., prove they were
not written by Moses, Joshua, Samuel, etc.
Secondly, Because they were not written till after the Babylonish
captivity began; and there is good reason to believe that not any book
in the bible was written before that period; at least it is proveable,
from the books themselves, as I have already shown, that they were not
written till after the commencement of the Jewish monarchy.
Thirdly, Because the manner in which the books ascribed to Ezekiel and
Daniel are written, agrees with the condition these men were in at the
time of writing them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account