The yellow book, an illustrated quarterly. Vol. 3, October, 1894
General
The yellow book, an illustrated quarterly. Vol. 3, October, 1894
English literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Great Britain -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
For my own part, I fancy Caroline was innocent of any infidelity to
her unhappy husband. But that is neither here nor there. Her behaviour
was certainly not above suspicion. It fully justified him in trying to
establish a case for her divorce. When, at length, she went abroad,
her vagaries were such that the whole of her English suite left her,
and we hear of her travelling about the Holy Land attended by another
family, named Bergami. When her husband succeeded to the throne, and
her name was struck out of the liturgy, she despatched expostulations
in absurd English to Lord Liverpool. Receiving no answer, she decided
to return and claim her right to be crowned Queen of England. Whatever
the unhappy lady did, she always was ridiculous. One cannot but
smile as one reads of her posting along the French roads in a yellow
travelling-chariot drawn by cart-horses, with a retinue that included
an alderman, a reclaimed lady-in-waiting, an Italian Count, the eldest
son of the alderman, and “a fine little female child, about three years
old, whom her Majesty, in conformity with her benevolent practices
on former occasions, had adopted.” The breakdown of her impeachment,
and her acceptance of an income, formed a fitting anti-climax to the
terrible absurdities of her position. She died from the effects of a
chill caught when she was trying vainly to force a way to her husband’s
coronation. Unhappy woman! Our sympathy for her is not misplaced. Fate
wrote her a most tremendous tragedy, and she played it in tights. Let
us pity her, but not forget to pity her husband, the King, also. It is
another common accusation against George that he was an undutiful and
unfeeling son. If this was so, it is certain that not all the blame
is to be laid upon him alone. There is more than one anecdote which
shows that King George disliked his eldest son, and took no trouble
to conceal his dislike, long before the boy had been freed from his
tutors. It was the coldness of his father and the petty restrictions
he loved to enforce that first drove George to seek the companionship
of such men as the Duke of Cumberland and the Duc d’Orléans, each of
whom were quick to inflame his impressionable mind to angry resentment.
Yet when Margaret Nicholson attempted the life of the King, the Prince
immediately posted off from Brighton that he might wait upon his father
at Windsor--a graceful act of piety that was rewarded by his father’s
refusal to see him. Hated by the Queen, who at this time did all she
could to keep her husband and his son apart, surrounded by intriguers,
who did all they could to set him against his father, George seems to
have behaved with great discretion. In the years that follow, I can
conceive no position more difficult than that in which he found himself
every time his father relapsed into lunacy. That he should have by
every means opposed those who through jealousy stood between him and
the regency was only natural. It cannot be said that at any time did he
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account