The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4)Valmiki
Religion
The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4)
Valmiki
Hinduism -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800; Religious life -- Hinduism -- Early works to 1800
10. But the world contained in Brahma, becomes both something and
nothing; as billows in calm waters may either exist or not exist. (So
the appearance and disappearance of the worlds in Brahma, like those
of the little billows in a quiet lake, prove their existence and
non-existence at the same time, as it is predicated of the Chaos or the
_Mahápralaya_. Gloss).[7]
11. Again it happens that certain figures are marked on some insensible
trees in some places by the hand of time, which people mistake for
images; so it comes to pass that certain figures of evanescent matter,
occur in the eternal mind, which men mistake for the real world.
12. This comparison of the figured pillar and tree and the world, is a
partial and not complete simile; the similitude here referring only to
the situation of the transient world in the substance of the permanent
Brahma (like the appearance of false figures in the firmly fixed pillar
and on the standing tree).
13. But this appearance of the world is not caused by another (as
in the case of the pillar, figures and pictures carved and painted
by the hands of the statuary and painter). It rises, lasts and sets
spontaneously and of itself in the self-same essence of Brahma (as the
figures in the tree or the waves of the Ocean). It is the property of
the divine soul and mind to raise and set such imageries in them by
turns, like the creations of our imagination.[8]
14. The meaning of the word void (_súnya_) instead of no void
(_asúnya_) or existence, is a fiction as false as inanity is a
nullity in nature. Something must come out of something, and never
from a void nothing; and how can nothing be reduced to nothing in the
end—_mahápralaya_ (_súnyatá súnyate katham_)? (_Ex nihilo nihil fit,
et in nihilum nihil reverti posse_).
15. In answer to your second question it has been said “there was
darkness neither.” Because the divine light of Brahma (which existed
before creation), was not like the light of a material luminary (which
is followed by darkness). The everlasting light was not to be obscured
by darkness, like the sunshine, or moon-light or the blazing of fire or
the twinkling of stars or our eyes.
16. It is the absence of the light of the great celestial luminaries,
that is called darkness, and there being no material property in the
immaterial essence of God, there could be no such light or darkness
with him before creation.
17. The light of the vacuous Brahma is an internal perception of the
soul, and is only felt and perceived within one’s self, and never
externally by any body; nor is this spiritual light ever clouded by any
mist or darkness of temporal objects.
18. The indestructible Brahma is beyond and free from external and
visible light and darkness; and is above the region of vacuum which is
contained, as it were, within his bosom, and contains the universe as
sheathed within its hollow womb.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account