The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4)Valmiki
Religion
The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4)
Valmiki
Hinduism -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800; Religious life -- Hinduism -- Early works to 1800
And also as we have more than once mentioned in the preceding articles,
that God is _aham bahushyám_—one in many, _to on to pan_ of the Greeks,
or the _unity_ divided into and containing an _Infinity_ of parts; so
His symbol the holy Om is one circle and emblem of infinity, which for
the sake of our conception and convenience is viewed in its Finite
parts of monads &c., and their ever increasing multiples by all other
numbers. But the monad like the prime number one whether multiplied or
divided by any number in arithmetic, remains still the same simple one.
Thus (1 × 2 = 2 × 1); (and 1/2 = 1 ÷ 2, or 1/2 = 1 × 1/2). This is the
root of the pantheistic doctrine of the Vedánta. सर्ब्बं खल्विदं ब्रह्म This
One is all: and the whole being taken from the whole the remainder is
whole. पूर्णस्य पूर्णमादाय पूर्णमेबाबशिष्यते ।
[Sidenote: 3. The Numerical Philosophy.]
It was the oldest _Sánkhya_ or numerical school of philosophy in
India, like the ancient Ionian school of Greece, that first made a
classification of all objects in nature under certain co-ordinate
groups for our contemplation of them under those classes; which its
later development of the _yoga_ system has converted to the objects
of our meditation as same with or pervaded by the Deity; or in other
words, has recommended the meditation of nature’s God in nature itself
as in Natural Theology. It was the Tantra worship of later ages that
divided the symbol of unity and infinity of the divine _om_ into a
decad of parts, as it is the custom of mathematicians to divide the
great circle of infinity into 360 degrees, though it might be divided
into an infinity of parts.
[Sidenote: 4. The Sánkhya and Pythagorean.]
The Sánkhya system of evolution which is closely allied to that of the
Darwinian, views the monad as the elementary _protozoa_, which combined
with other monads make up the duads, triads &c. we have mentioned
before, and all which are resolvable to the primary monad. Om is always
‘one’ thing; nothing can destroy that numerical existence, combine the
thing in every possible variety of ways, and it still remains ‘_one_.’
It cannot be less than _one_, it cannot be more. As (2 = 1 + 1 = II &
3 = 1 + 1 + 1 = III). Resolve it into its minutest particles, and each
particle is _one_. As (½, ⅓, ¼ &c.). One is the only absolute
number; all others are but relations to it. The Infinite therefore
must be one, and if you take infinity and the infinitesimals from
the infinite, there remains also the same infinity; according to the
Vedánta paradox पूर्णमदः पूर्णमिदं पूर्णात् पूर्णमुदुच्यते । and all modes of existence
are but finite aspects of the Infinite.
[Sidenote: 5. Different aspects of the soul.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account