The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4)Valmiki
Religion
The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4)
Valmiki
Hinduism -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800; Religious life -- Hinduism -- Early works to 1800
The above cited passage and numerous other texts of the Vedánta
such as the following, यतो वा इमानि भूतानि जायन्ते येन जातानि । and जन्माद्यस्ययतोऽन्वयात् &c.,
unanimously prove _a priori_ and by deductive reasoning that Brahma
is the primary cause from which all others are derived and deduced
by reason. This is called the _Púrva vat_ or _a priori_ reasoning in
the Nyaya philosophy, which is shewn to be the logical inference of
the effect from its cause. यत्रकारणेन कार्य्यमनुमीयते यथा मेघोन्नत्या
भविष्यतिबृष्टिरिति । वात्स्यायनः ।१ ।१ ।६ ।
[Sidenote: 5. Evidences of the First cause.]
5. The priori inference of a pre-existent cause is supported by
many other modes of reasoning as we shall state below. 1. By the
Cosmological reasoning of Humboldt, Leibnitz and others, it is evident
that some being was uncaused, or was of itself without a cause.
Therefore God is the first cause of all things. (Leibnitz). 2. By
the Anthropological reasoning founded on certain observed facts or
phenomena of human consciousness, its knowledge of the subjective
_ego_ and objective _non ego_ &c. 3. By the Ontological, we find the
existence in the mind of a clear and distinct idea of God, as a perfect
Being or _Ens_ or entity (sat) perfectly eminent. 4. Psychological
Intuitive reasoning shows us clearly that “we may form the idea of a
supremely perfect being of whom we have a conscious proof. And as in
the exercise of our intellect we become conscious of a subjective unity
underlying the external diversity, so by the unvarying revelations of
reason, we are led to recognize the existence of a Deity who, amidst
all the shifting phenomena of the universe remains one and Immutable.”
Vide Devendra Náth Tagore’s Ontology p. 14.
[Sidenote: 6. A Posteriori Argument.]
The Vedánta philosophy pursues also a course of inductive reasoning in
its aphorism of जन्माद्यस्ययतः । अस्यविश्वस्य जन्मादि यतः, rising from the creation
to its maker. This is the process of परबत् or _a posteriori_
reasoning of the Nyáya philosophy, in its inference of the cause
fire from its effect the smoke (पर्ब्बतोवन्हिमान् धुमात्), or of the major term
व्यपकाग्नि from the middle व्यप्यधूम । This is the physical
reasoning of modern inductive science, which infers from the facts of
existence an author of these facts. The Universe exists, therefore it
has a cause, which is prior to all other causes. There are some who
attempt to prove the posteriori परवत् argument of the Veda
from a different construction of the Gáyatri hymn, ascending from the
_Vyáhritis_ or creation of the worlds (भूर्भुवःस्वर्) to their creator
तत् सविता; but this mode of reasoning is not justified by others,
by reason of the initial Om = God.
[Sidenote: 7. Ambiguity of the word _Sat_.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account