The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 4 (of 4), Part 2 (of 2)Valmiki
Religion
The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 4 (of 4), Part 2 (of 2)
Valmiki
Hinduism -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800; Religious life -- Hinduism -- Early works to 1800
6. The holy and liberated souls, have neither their bodies nor
reminiscences any more; nor the passing currents of other rivers,
return or whirl back, like the whirlpools of some. (So the sruti:--The
liberated souls, return no more to mortality).
7. Or if he have any body at all, owing to the reminiscence of his
former state; it must be an unearthly and immaterial body, quite still
and rarefied as in imaginary forms. (Such are the spiritual bodies of
gods and angels).
8. As our imagination presents to us, a visionary mountain to the
mind’s eye; such is the air-drawn body of the all engrossing Virát;
presented unto us without any earthly form. (Virát is Pantheon).
9. There is therefore no such thing as reminiscence, at any time
whatsoever; it is merely built on popular belief, and not upon the
reason of wise men. (Because the creator had no remembrance of a prior
creation in his first formation of the world).
10. Ráma rejoined:--How do you say sir, that rememberest everything
that there was no previous remembrance in the first creator; who
must have remembered the creation of a first _kalpa_ or learnt it, O
inspired sage, by his inspiration also. (So says the sruti:--Brahmá
performed austerities and was inspired by the Lord, see Manu I).
11. Vasishtha replied:--The pre-existence of reminiscence is possible
in the outward or visible world, which admits of cause and effect; but
can it be where there is no such world, but a mere vacuum only.
12. There is nothing visible here, from the highest heaven to
the lowest pit; if it <were> so a nullity only, then what is its
reminiscence and to what use is it.
13. The remembrance of the prior world in its absence, is called its
reminiscence; but when there never was nor is any visible world at all,
how can you think of its reminiscence; even in fancy.
14. The entire absence of the phenomenals at all times, makes it
identic with the invisible Brahma himself; and this being the truth of
it, say how can you fancy the reminiscence of anything.
15. Therefore the prime creator, could have no remembrance of a prior
existence; nor could he have any bodily form, being of a spiritual form
of pure intelligence only.
16. We should remember the past from our present state, that we are
mortal beings undergoing repeated transmigrations, and not bring other
persons and things to our remembrance, as others think it to mean. (We
should remember ourselves only).
17. Reminiscence means the retention of past things, in our remembrance
or inward memory; but what can we remember, when there nothing was nor
is, nor shall ever be anything.
18. All this stupendous fabric, is the supreme Brahma itself; who
remains as immovable as a mountain, and without its beginning, middle
or end. What then is the reminiscence or presence of it?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account