Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603 -- Fiction; Historical fiction
"It was even with him," the Bishop said. "He seemed a worthy and a
pious man and full of zeal for this see of Durham."
"Well, you shall hear," the monk said. "I will wager he came with this
advice—that you should lay hands upon the estates of the Young Lovell
under a writ of sorcery, and so divide them between yourself and the
Knights of Haltwhistle and Cullerford. Thus you should be beforehand
with the Earl of Northumberland who would do as much for the King’s
disgrace in these parts."
"It was even that that he reded me do," the Bishop said. "He urged the
see should gain much good land thereby."
"And lose much worship," the monk said. "It is that that Sir Bertram
wishes."
"I can see as much as that," the Bishop answered. "And this Master
Stone—who is an ill-looking man—never told me that the Young Lovell, as
you say, was come again, but said that he was dead and that Cullerford
and Haltwhistle, being by marriage his heirs, would very willingly
divide with me. He was insistent with me to issue that writ this
afternoon."
"Well, it was a clever, foul scheme," the monk Francis said. "For well
that bailiff knew the Young Lovell had been seen riding into Castle
Lovell! Hard he has ridden here—if a lawyer can ride hard—to get that
writ against the Young Lovell or ever we could come to you. So with
that he would have earned great disgrace for you and this see. But what
I would have you do is to confirm, as far as the see goes, that Young
Lovell in his inheritance. So it will rest with the King, the Earl of
Northumberland, and this Sir Bertram to dispossess him. And thus shall
their names stink in the nostrils of all this country-side. For that
young man is very beloved, by gentle and simple, having fought well
against the false Scots at Kenchie’s Burn, as these eyes did see."
The monk spoke long and earnestly in that sense; and indeed he had the
right of it. There would have been none in that country that would not
have cried shame on the Church for her greed, if the Bishop had divided
these lands with foul knights like Sir Walter Limousin and Symonde Vesey
and Vesey the outlaw and the Decies. But if the Bishop would confirm
Sir Paris Lovell in the lands over which the see had rights and
overlordships, great discredit would fall upon the Percy for having, in
a Warden’s Court, essayed to ruin the Young Lovell on a false charge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account