Hakuin died in his sleep at age eighty-three. During his life he had
reestablished Rinzai Zen in Japan in a form fully as rigorous as ever
practiced in the monasteries of T'ang and Sung China, and he had
simultaneously discovered a way this Zen could be made accessible to
laymen, through meditation in activity. Whereas previous Japanese
teachers had let koan practice atrophy in order to attract a greater
number of followers, Hakuin simultaneously made Zen both more authentic
and more popular. His genius thereby saved traditional Zen in its
classical form, while at last making it accessible and meaningful in
modern life.
Chapter Nineteen
REFLECTIONS
What is the resilience of Zen that has allowed it to survive and
flourish over all the centuries, even though frequently at odds
philosophically with its milieu? And why have the insights of obscure
rural teachers from the Chinese and Japanese Middle Ages remained
pertinent to much of modern life in the West? On the other hand, why
has there been a consistent criticism of Zen (from early China to the
present day) condemning it as a retreat from reality--or worse, a
preoccupation with self amidst a world that calls for social
conscience?
These questions are complex, but they should be acknowledged in any
inquiry into Zen thought. They are also matters of opinion: those
wishing to see Zen as unwholesome are fixed in their critical views,
just as those committed to Zen practice are unshakably steadfast. What
follows is also opinion, even though an attempt has been made to
maintain balance.
SOCIAL CONSCIENCE IN ZEN
A distinguished modern Zen master was once asked if Zen followers
looked only inward, with no concern for others. He replied that in Zen
the distinction between oneself and the world was the first thing to be
dissolved. Consequently, mere self-love is impossible; it resolves
naturally into a love of all things. Stated in this way, Zen teachings
become, in a twinkling, a profound moral philosophy. Where there is no
distinction between the universe and ourselves, the very concept of the
ego is inappropriate. We cannot think of ourselves without
simultaneously thinking of others. Zen is not, therefore, an obsession
with the self, but rather an obsession with the universe, with all
things--from nature to the social betterment of all. Although Zen
initially forces a novice to focus on his own mind, this is only to
enable him or her to attain the insight to merge with all things, great
and small. True Zen introspection eventually must lead to the
dissolution of the self. When this occurs, we no longer need the
chiding of a Golden Rule.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account