15. Hu Shih, "The Development of Zen Buddhism in China," Chinese Social
and Political Science Review, 15,4 (January 1932), p. 483, Philip
Yampolsky (private communication) has questioned this generalization of
Hu Shih, noting, "There were few practicing 'Zen' Buddhists, but other
Chinese Buddhists probably meditated seriously, although not
exclusively."
16. Suzuki, Essays in Zen Buddhism, First Series, p, 186.
17. See Hu Shih, "Development of Zen Buddhism in China," p. 482: "But
the whole system of _dhyana_ practice, even in its concise form as
presented in the translated manuals, was not fully understood by the
Chinese Buddhists. . . . The best proof of this is the following
quotation from Hui-chiao, the scholarly historian of Buddhism and
author of the first series of Buddhist Biographies which was finished
in 519. In his general summary of the biographies of practitioners of
_dhyana_, Hui-chiao said: 'But the apparent utility of _dhyana_ lies in
the attainment of magic powers. . .'.'"
18. Suzuki (Essays in Zen Buddhism, First Series, p. 191), points out,
"Nagarjuna says in his famous commentary on the Prajnaparamita sutra,
'Moral conduct is the skin, meditation is the flesh, the higher
understanding is the bone, and the mind subtle and good is the marrow.'
" Since this commentary must have been common knowledge, the interest
in Bodhidharma's alleged exchange with his disciples lies in his
recasting of a common coinage.
19. From the Ch'uan fa-pao chi (ca. 700-10) of Tu Fei, as described by
Yampolsky, The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriach. This story happens
to parallel closely the posthumous capers ascribed to certain famous
religious Taoists of the age.
20. Dumoulin, History of Zen Buddhism, p. 72.
21. Hu Shih, "Development of Zen Buddhism in China," p. 52.
22.
2. HUI-K'O: SECOND PATRIARCH OF ZEN
1. Translated in Suzuki, Essays in Zen Buddhism, First Series, p.190.
2. He is well documented in Tao-hsuan's Hsu kao-seng chuan or Further
Biographies of Eminent Priests (A.D. 645). Selected portions of this
biography are related in Yampolsky, Platform Sutra of the Sixth
Patriarch; and Suzuki, Essays in Zen Buddhism, First Series, which form
the basis for much of the historical information reported here. Other
useful sources are Dumoulin, History of Zen Buddhism; and Chou Hsiang-
kuang, _Dhyana_ Buddhism in China (Allahabad, India: Indo-Chinese
Literature Publications, 1960).
3. The Further Biographies of Eminent Priests by Tao-hsuan declares that
bandits were responsible for severing his arm, but the 710 Chuan fa-pao
chi of Tu Fei piously refutes this version, presumably since efforts
were starting to get underway to construct a Zen lineage, and dramatic
episodes of interaction were essential. This later work was also the
first to report that Bodhidharma was poisoned and then later seen
walking back to India.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account