Theory & History of HistoriographyCroce, Benedetto
Philosophy
Theory & History of Historiography
Croce, Benedetto
Historiography
Indeed, the fourth preconception, which we now proceed to state, and
which links itself with the preceding, and, together with all the
preceding, to the theological nature of the old metaphysic, concerns
the _figure of the philosopher,_ as Buddha or the Awakened One, who
posits himself as superior to others (and to himself in the moments
when he is not a philosopher), because he holds himself to be free from
human passions, illusions, and agitations by means of philosophy. This
is the case with the believer, who fixes his mind upon God and shakes
off earthly cares, like the lover, who feels himself blessed in the
possession of the beloved and defies the whole world. But the world
soon takes its revenge both upon the believer and the lover, and does
not fail to insist upon its rights. Such an illusion is impossible for
the philosophical historian, who differs from the other in feeling
himself irresistibly involved in the course of history, as at once both
subject and object, and who is therefore led to negate felicity or
beatitude, as he negates every other abstraction (because, as has been
well said, _le bonheur est le contraire de la sensation de vivre_), and
to accept life as it is, as joy that overcomes sorrow and perpetually
produces new sorrows and new unstable joys. And history, which he
thinks as the only truth, is the work of tireless thought, which
conditions practical work, as practical work conditions the new work of
thought. Thus the primacy formerly attributed to the contemplative life
is now transferred not to active life, but to life in its integrity,
which is at once thought and action. And every man is a philosopher
(in his circle, however wide or narrow it may appear), and every
philosopher is a man, indissolubly linked to the conditions of human
life, which it is not given to anyone to transcend. The mystical or
apocalyptic philosopher of the Græco-Roman decadence was well able to
separate himself from the world: the great thinkers, like Hegel, who
inaugurated the epoch of modern philosophy, although they denied the
primacy of the abstract contemplative life, were liable to fall back
into the error of belief in this supremacy and to conceive a sphere of
absolute spirit, a process of liberation through art, religion, and
philosophy, as a means of reaching it; but the once sublime figure of
the philosopher blessed in the absolute, when we try to revive it in
this modern world of ours, becomes tinged with the comic. It is true
that satire has now but little material upon which to exercise itself,
and is reduced to aiming its shafts at the 'professors of philosophy'
(according to the type of philosopher that has been created by modern
universities, which is partly the heir of the 'master of theology'
of the Middle Ages): against the professors, that is to say, to the
extent that they continue to repeat mechanically abstract general
propositions, and seem to be unmoved by the passions and the problems
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account