Theory & History of HistoriographyCroce, Benedetto
Philosophy
Theory & History of Historiography
Croce, Benedetto
Historiography
same time the fortuitous and chance, to which the ancients had often
abandoned it, and recognizes its own proper law, which is no longer
a natural law, blind fate, or even the influence of the stars (St
Augustine confutes this doctrine of the pagans), but rationality,
intelligence, _providence._ This conception was not unknown to ancient
philosophy, but is now set free from the frost of intellectualism and
abstractionism and becomes warm and fruitful. Providence guides and
disposes the course of events, directing them to an end, permitting
evils as punishments and as instruments of education, determining the
greatness and the catastrophes of empires, in order to prepare the
kingdom of God. This means that for the first time is really broken the
idea of the _circle,_ of the perpetual return of human affairs to their
starting-point, of the vain labour of the Danaïds (St Augustine also
combats the _circuitus_); history for the first time is here understood
_as progress_: a progress that the ancient historians did not succeed
in discovering, save in rare glimpses, thus falling into unconsolable
pessimism, whereas Christian pessimism is irradiated with hope. Hence
the importance to be attributed to the _succession of empires_ and to
the function fulfilled by each of them, and especially with regard
to the Roman Empire, which politically unified the world that Christ
came to unify spiritually, to the position of Judaism as opposed to
Christianity, and the like. These questions have been answered in
various ways, but on the common assumption that divine intelligence
had willed those events, that greatness and that decadence, those joys
and afflictions, and therefore that all had been necessary means of
the divine work, and that all had competed in and were competing in
the final end of history, linked one with the other, not as effects
following from a blind cause, but as stages of a process. Hence, too,
history understood as _universal_ history, no longer in the sense of
Polybius, who narrates the transactions of those states which enter
into relations with one another, but in the profounder sense of a
history of the universal, of the universal by excellence, which is
history in labour with God and toward God. By means of this spirit
which invests them, even the most neglected of the chronicles become
surrounded with a halo, which is wanting to the classical histories of
Greece and Rome, and which, however distant they be from our particular
view-points, yet in their general aspect makes them very near to our
heart and mind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account