Theory & History of HistoriographyCroce, Benedetto
Philosophy
Theory & History of Historiography
Croce, Benedetto
Historiography
However, the practical needs of chroniclism and of learning make
themselves felt here also. Just as in metrical treatises the internal
rhythm of a poem is resolved into external rhythm and divided into
syllables and feet, into long and short vowels, tonic and rhythmic
accents, into strophes and series of strophes, and so on, so the
internal time of historical thought (that time which is thought
itself) is derived from chroniclism converted into external time, or
temporal series, of which the elements are spatially separated from one
another. Scheme and facts are no longer one, but two, and the facts
are disposed according to the scheme, and divided according to the
scheme into major and minor cycles (for example, according to hours,
days, months, years, centuries, and millenniums, where the calculation
is based upon the rotations and revolutions of the earth upon itself
and round the sun). Such is _chronology_, by means of which we know
that the histories of Sparta, Athens, and Rome filled the thousand
years preceding Christ, that of the Lombards, the Visigoths, and the
Franks the first millennium after Christ, and that we are still in the
second millennium. This mode of chronology can be pursued by means of
particularizing incidents thus: that the Empire of the West ended in
A.D. 476 (although it did not really end then or had already ended
previously); that Charlemagne the Frank was crowned Emperor at Rome
by Pope Leo III in the year 800; that America was discovered in 1492,
and that the Thirty Years War ended in 1648. It is of the greatest
use to us to know these things, or (since we really _know_ nothing
in this way) to acquire the capacity of so checking references to
facts that we are able to find them easily and promptly when occasion
arises. Certainly no one thinks of speaking ill of chronologies and
chronographies and tables and synoptic views of history, although in
using them we run the risk (and in what thing done by man does he not
run a risk?) of seeing worthy folk impressed with the belief that the
number produces the event, as the hand of the clock, when it touches
the sign of the hour, makes the clock strike; or (as an old professor
of mine used to say) that the curtain fell upon the acting of ancient
history in 476, to rise again immediately afterward on the beginning of
the Middle Ages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account