It is thus that enlightened natural history affords to philosophy principles, from whence the most important conclusions may be drawn. It is thus that a system may be perceived in that which, to common observation, seems to be nothing but the disorderly accident of things; a system in which wisdom and benevolence conduct the endless order of a changing world. What a comfort to man, for whom that system was contrived, as the only living being on this earth who can perceive it; what a comfort, I say, to think that the Author of our existence has given such evident marks of his good-will towards man, in this progressive state of his understanding! What greater security can be desired for the continuance of our intellectual existence,--an existence which rises infinitely above that of the mere animal, conducted by reason for the purposes of life alone. The view of this interesting subject, which I had given in the first part, published in the Transactions of the Edinburgh Royal Society, has been seen by some men of science in a light which does not allow them, it would appear, to admit of the general principle which I would thereby endeavour to establish. Some contend that the rivers do not travel the material of the decaying land;--Why?--because they have not seen all those materials moved. Others alledge, that stones and rocks may be formed upon the surface of the earth, instead of being there all in a state of decay. These are matters of fact which it is in the power of men who have proper observation to determine; it is my business to generalise those facts and observations, and to bring them in confirmation of a theory which is necessarily founded upon the decaying nature and perishing state of all that appears to us above the surface of the sea. Nothing is more evident, than that the general effect of mineral operations is to consolidate that which had been in an incoherent state when formed at the bottom of the sea, and thus to produce those rocks and indurated bodies which constitute the basis of our vegetable soil; but, that indurating or consolidating operation is not the immediate object of our observation; and, to see the evidence of that operation, or the nature of that cause, requires a long chain of reasoning from the most extensive physical principles. Our present subject of investigation requires no such abstract distant _media_, by which the effect is to be connected with its cause; the actual operation in general is the object of our immediate observation; and here we have only to reason from less to more, and not to homologate things which may, to men of narrow principles, appear to be of different kinds. But even here we find difficulty in persuading those who have taken unjust views of things; for, those who will not deny the truth of every step in this chain of reasoning, will deny the end to which it leads, merely because they are not disposed to admit the progress of that order which appears in nature.