Christian fiction; Wingfold, Thomas (Fictitious character) -- Fiction
“There I cannot go with you, sir,” said Richard, who, for all the
impression Barbara had made upon him, had not yet thought of the world
as in any sense alive; it was to him but an aggregate of laws and
results, the great dissecting-room of creation, the happy hunting
ground of the goddess who calls herself Science, though she can claim to
understand as yet no single fact.
“Why?” asked Wingfold.
“Because I cannot receive the simile at all. I cannot allow expression
of thought where no thought is.”
Here a certain look on the face of the young workman helped the parson
toward understanding the position he meant to take, “Ah!” he answered,
“I see I mistook you! I understand now! Sleep she or wake she, you will
not allow thought on the face of Nature! Am I right?”
“That is what I would say, sir,” answered Richard.
“We must look at that!” returned Wingfold. “That would be scanned!--You
would conceive the world as a sort of machine that goes for certain
purposes--like a clock, for instance, whose duty it is to tell the time
of the day?--Do I represent you truly?”
“So far, sir. Only one machine may have many uses!”
“True! A clock may do more for us than tell the time! It may tell
how fast it is going, and wake solemn thought. But if you came upon a
machine that constantly waked in you--not thoughts only, but the most
delicate and indescribable feelings--what would you say then? Would you
allow thought there?”
“Surely not that the machine was thinking!”
“Certainly not. But would you allow thought concerned in it? Would you
allow that thought must have preceded and occasioned its existence?
Would you allow that thought therefore must yet be interested in its
power to produce thought, and might, if it chose, minister to the
continuance or enlargement of the power it had originated?”
“Perhaps I should be compelled to allow that much in regard to a clock
even!--Are we coming to the Paley-argument, sir?” said Richard.
“I think not,” answered Wingfold. “My argument seems to me one of my
own. It is not drawn from design but from operation: where a thing wakes
thought and feeling, I say, must not thought and feeling be somewhere
concerned in its origin?”
“Might not the thought and feeling come by association, as in the case
of the clock suggesting the flight of time?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account