Christian fiction; Wingfold, Thomas (Fictitious character) -- Fiction
She would fain have time to think, for she feared in some way
compromising herself. And in any case, the longer the crisis could be
postponed, the better for her prospects in the issue!
“I will not promise anything,” answered Barbara. “I dread promising.”
“Why?” asked lady Ann, raising her eyebrows.
“Because promises have to be kept, and that is sometimes very difficult;
and because sometimes you find you ought not to have made them, and yet
you must keep them. It is a horrid thing to have to keep a promise you
don't like keeping, especially if it hurts anybody.”
“But if you ought to make the promise?” suggested lady Ann.
“Then you must make it. But where there is no _ought_, I think it wrong
to bind yourself. What right have you, when you don't know what may
be wanted of you, to tie your own hands and feet? There may come an
earthquake or a fire!”
“Does friendship demand nothing? You are our guest!”
It was not in lying only that lady Ann was not a lady.
“One's friends may have conflicting interests!” said Barbara.
Lady Ann was convinced that Richard was at the root of the affair, and
she hated him. What if he _were_ the heir, and it could be proved! The
thought was sickening. It was with the utmost strain that she kept up
her apparent indifference before the mocking imp honest Barbara seemed
to her. For heaven is the devil's hell, and the true are the devils of
it. How was she to assure herself concerning the fellow? how discover
what he was, what he knew, and how much he could prove? She could not
even think, with that little savage sitting there, staring out of her
wide eyes!
“My sweet Barbara,” she said, “I am so much obliged to you for letting
me know! I will not ask any promise from you. Only you must not
heedlessly bring trouble upon us. If the thing were talked about, some
unprincipled lawyer would be sure to take it up, and there would be
another claimant-case, with the people in a hubbub, and thousands of
ignorant honest folk duped of their money to enrich the rascality. I
heard a distinguished judge once say, that, even if the claimant _were_
the real sir Roger, he had no right to the property, having so long
neglected the duties of it as to make it impossible to be certain of his
identity. Such people put the country to enormous expense, and are never
of any service to it. It is a wrong to all classes when a man without
education succeeds to property. For one thing he will always side with
the tenants against the land. And what service can any such man render
his country in parliament? Without a suitable training there can be no
genuine right.”
She was on the point of adding--“And then are the hopes and services and
just expectations of a lifetime to go for nothing?” but checked herself
and was silent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account