Christian fiction; Wingfold, Thomas (Fictitious character) -- Fiction
It were better to rid the place of the bookbinder--but how? As to
whether he was the legal heir or not, she would rather remain ignorant,
only that, assured on the point, she would better understand how to deal
with his pretension! But she could not consult sir Wilton, because
she suspected him of a lingering regard for the dead wife which would
naturally influence his feeling for the live son--if live he were: no
doubt he had enjoyed the company of the low-born woman more than
hers, for she, a woman of society, knew what was right! She had reason
therefore to fear him prejudiced for any pretender! Arthur and he got on
quite as well as could be expected of father and son--their differences
never came to much; but on the other hand sir Wilton had a demoniacal
pleasure in frustrating! To make a man he disliked furious, was honey
and nuts to sir Wilton; and she knew a woman whose disappointment would
be dearer to him than that of all his enemies together! It was better
therefore that he should have no hint, and especially from her, of what
was in the air!
Lady Ann thought herself a good woman because she never felt interest
enough to be spiteful like sir Wilton; yet, very strangely, not knowing
in herself what repentance meant, she judged him capable of doing her
the wrong of atoning to his first wife for his neglect of her, by being
good to her child! Thinking over her talk with Barbara, she could
not, after all, feel certain that Richard knew, or that he had incited
Barbara to take his part. But in any case it was better to get rid of
him! It was dangerous to have him in the house! He might be spending
his nights in trumping up evidence! At any moment he might appeal to sir
Wilton as his father! But at the worst, he would be unable to prove the
thing right off, and if her husband would but act like a man, they might
impede the attempt beyond the possibility of its success!
One comfort was, that, she was all but confident, the child was not
already baptized when stolen from Mortgrange; neither were such as would
steal children likely to have them baptized; therefore the God who would
not allow the unbaptized to lie in his part of the cemetery, would never
favour his succession to the title and estate of Mortgrange! The fact
must have its weight with Providence!--whom lady Ann always regarded us
a good churchman: he would never take the part of one that had not
been baptized! Besides, the fellow was sure to turn out a socialist,
or anarchist, or positivist, or radical, or something worse! She would
dispute his identity to the last, and assert his imposture beyond it!
Her duty to society demanded that she should not give in!
Suddenly she remembered the description her husband had given her of
the ugliness of the infant: this man was decidedly handsome! Then she
remembered that sir Wilton had told her of a membrane between certain of
his fingers--horrible creature: she must examine the impostor!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account