Thirty Years' View (Vol. 2 of 2): or, A History of the Working of the American Government for Thirty Years, from 1820 to 1850Benton, Thomas Hart
History
Thirty Years' View (Vol. 2 of 2): or, A History of the Working of the American Government for Thirty Years, from 1820 to 1850
Benton, Thomas Hart
United States -- Politics and government -- 1815-1861
"On the motion of the senator from Georgia (Mr. CUTHBERT), the
23d section, which provides for the collection of the dues of
the government in specie, was struck out, with the aid of a
few on this side, and the entire opposition to the divorce on
the other. That section provided for the repeal of the joint
resolution of 1816, which authorizes the receipt of bank notes
as cash in the dues of the public. The effects of this will be,
should the bill pass in its present shape, that the government
will collect its revenue and make its disbursements exclusively
in bank notes; as it did before the suspension took place in
May last. Things will stand precisely as they did then, with
but a single exception, that the public deposits will be made
with the officers of the government instead of the banks, under
the provision of the deposit act of 1836. Thus far is certain.
All agree that such is the fact; and such the effect of the
passage of this bill as it stands. Now, he intended to show
conclusively, that the difference between depositing the public
money with the public officers, or with the banks themselves,
was merely nominal, as far as the operation and profits of the
banks were concerned; that they would not make one cent less
profit, or issue a single dollar less, if the deposits be kept
by the officers of the government instead of themselves; and, of
course, that the system would be equally subject to expansions
and contractions, and equally exposed to catastrophes like the
present, in the one, as the other, mode of keeping.
"But he had other and insuperable objections. In giving the bill
originally his support, he was governed by a deep conviction
that the total separation of the government and the banks was
indispensable. He firmly believed that we had reached a point
where the separation was absolutely necessary to save both
government and banks. He was under a strong impression that the
banking system had reached a point of decrepitude--that great
and important changes were necessary to save it and prevent
convulsions; and that the first step was a perpetual separation
between them and the government. But there could be, in his
opinion, no separation--no divorce--without collecting the
public dues in the legal and constitutional currency of the
country. Without that, all would prove a perfect delusion; as
this bill would prove should it pass. We had no constitutional
right to treat the notes of mere private corporations as cash;
and if we did, nothing would be done.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account