Thirty Years' View (Vol. 2 of 2): or, A History of the Working of the American Government for Thirty Years, from 1820 to 1850Benton, Thomas Hart
History
Thirty Years' View (Vol. 2 of 2): or, A History of the Working of the American Government for Thirty Years, from 1820 to 1850
Benton, Thomas Hart
United States -- Politics and government -- 1815-1861
The subject of the petitions was disagreeable in itself; the
language in which they were couched was offensive; and the
wantonness of their presentation aggravated a proceeding
sufficiently provoking in the civilest form in which it could be
conducted. Many petitions were in the same words, bearing internal
evidence of concert among their signers; many were signed by women,
whose proper sphere was far from the field of legislation; all
united in a common purpose, which bespoke community of origin, and
the superintendence of a general direction. Every presentation gave
rise to a question and debate, in which sentiments and feelings
were expressed and consequences predicted, which it was painful to
hear. While almost every senator condemned these petitions, and the
spirit in which they originated, and the language in which they were
couched, and considered them as tending to no practical object, and
only calculated to make dissension and irritation, there were others
who took them in a graver sense, and considered them as leading to
the inevitable separation of the States. In this sense Mr. Calhoun
said:
"He had foreseen what this subject would come to. He knew its
origin, and that it lay deeper than was supposed. It grew out
of a spirit of fanaticism which was daily increasing, and, if
not met _in limine_, would by and by dissolve this Union. It was
particularly our duty to keep the matter out of the Senate--out
of the halls of the National Legislature. These fanatics were
interfering with what they had no right. Grant the reception
of these petitions, and you will next be asked to act on them.
He was for no conciliatory course, no temporizing; instead of
yielding one inch, he would rise in opposition; and he hoped
every man from the South would stand by him to put down this
growing evil. There was but one question that would ever destroy
this Union, and that was involved in this principle. Yes; this
was potent enough for it, and must be early arrested if the
Union was to be preserved. A man must see little into what is
going on if he did not perceive that this spirit was growing,
and that the rising generation was becoming more strongly imbued
with it. It was not to be stopped by reports on paper, but by
action, and very decided action."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account