Thirty Years' View (Vol. 2 of 2): or, A History of the Working of the American Government for Thirty Years, from 1820 to 1850Benton, Thomas Hart
History
Thirty Years' View (Vol. 2 of 2): or, A History of the Working of the American Government for Thirty Years, from 1820 to 1850
Benton, Thomas Hart
United States -- Politics and government -- 1815-1861
limit but the will of the makers, and the supply of lamp-black
and rags. The continental bills of the Revolution, and the
assignats of France, should furnish some instructive lessons
on this head. Direct loans are always voluntary on the part of
the lender; treasury note loans may be a forced borrowing from
the government creditor--as much so as if the bayonet were put
to his breast; for necessity has no law, and the necessitous
claimant must take what is tendered, whether with or without
interest--whether ten or fifty per cent. below par. I distrust,
dislike, and would fain eschew, this treasury note resource. I
prefer the direct loans of 1820-'21. I could only bring myself
to acquiesce in this measure when it was urged that there was
not time to carry a loan through its forms; nor even then could
I consent to it, until every feature of a currency character had
been eradicated from the face of the bill."
The bill passed the Senate by a general vote, only Messrs. Clay,
Crittenden, Preston, Southard, and Spence of Maryland, voting
against it. In the House of Representatives it encountered a more
strenuous resistance, and was subjected to some trials which showed
the dangerous proclivity of these notes to slide from the foundation
of investment into the slippery path of currency. Several motions
were made to reduce their size--to make them as low as $25; and that
failing, to reduce them to $50; which succeeded. The interest was
struck at in a motion to reduce it to a nominal amount; and this
motion, like that for reducing the minimum size to $25, received a
large support--some ninety votes. The motion to reduce to $50 was
carried by a majority of forty. Returning to the Senate with this
amendment, Mr. Benton moved to restore the $100 limit, and intimated
his intention, if it was not done, of withholding his support from
the bill--declaring that nothing but the immediate wants of the
Treasury, and the lack of time to raise the money by a direct loan
as declared by the Secretary of the Treasury, could have brought him
to vote for treasury notes in any shape. Mr. Clay opposed the whole
scheme as a government bank in disguise, but supported Mr. Benton's
motion as being adverse to that design. He said:
"He had been all along opposed to this measure, and he saw
nothing now to change that opinion. Mr. C. would have been glad
to aid the wants of the Treasury, but thought it might have been
done better by suspending the action of many appropriations not
so indispensably necessary, rather than by resorting to a loan.
Reduction, economy, retrenchment, had been recommended by the
President, and why not then pursued? Mr. C.'s chief objection,
however, was, that these notes were mere post notes, only
differing from bank notes of that kind in giving the Secretary a
power of fixing the interest as he pleases.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account