It must be owned that Dr. Chalmers was not satisfied with the success of
the Sustentation Fund. It had been adopted not only unanimously but
enthusiastically by the whole church, and considering all that had to be
done for other purposes, it was marvellous that in the first year it
amounted to £68,700, enough to furnish fully £100 to six hundred
ministers. That, however, was but two-thirds of the amount which
Chalmers had named as the minimum payment to each minister from this
fund. And, besides, there were many additional ministers to be provided
for, needed by the new adhering congregations; and moreover,—and this
was never absent from his thoughts—there was to be considered the vast
home-mission work needed in order to realise his lifelong desire to
overtake the whole spiritual destitution of the country. It was the
inadequacy of the Sustentation Fund to realise this further object that
was the chief cause of his disappointment. Moreover, he found in the
machinery of his scheme a serious leak, which bade fair to ruin it.
Every congregation was to receive an equal dividend for its minister
from this fund, whatever might be the amount of its own contributions.
In order that this provision might work satisfactorily, it was necessary
that congregations should make an equal effort for the fund. But it was
soon found that many congregations were steeped in selfishness, and,
while drawing their equal dividend, their contributions were but a
fraction of what they should have been. Chalmers had calculated on a
brotherly spirit and a brotherly conscience, which he now found were
often wanting. He became alarmed for the future, and proposed a
modification of the original arrangement, to the effect that no
congregation should receive from the fund more than its own contribution
and a half more. But it was too late. The fund had been constituted on
the footing of an equal dividend, and there was a strong opposition to
the change. Chalmers remonstrated by word of mouth and by pamphlets on
the ’Economics of the Free Church.’ All that the Assembly would allow
was that the new plan should be tried with new congregations. But as
the new congregations were generally comparatively poor, the result was
something like starvation to their ministers; and, after a short trial,
the plan was given up. But no one could deny the serious nature of the
evil that Chalmers had pointed out, and for many a long year there were
perplexed discussions as to the remedy. Even now, though the leak has
been abundantly dealt with, it has not been quite overcome. In his
remonstrances, Chalmers showed more vehemence than was perhaps
reasonable, considering that it was the defect of his own original
scheme that caused the difficulty. But his vehemence was due to the
conviction that came home so strongly to him, that the Sustentation Fund
could not become the instrument of carrying out his dearly-cherished
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account