Notwithstanding the hostility of Upper Canadians to the principle of
separate schools, Scott's bill, in 1863, became law. Due largely to
McGee's influence, it was carried as a government measure. This was
fatal to the ministry. Although Scott's Act affected only Upper
Canada, it was carried against the heated opposition of a majority
from that province. The principle of the double majority, to which
Sandfield Macdonald had pinned his colours, was flagrantly ignored,
and Brown with his followers had an ample opportunity to sing
condemnations. The government's action was a confession that its
much proclaimed principle could not always be applied, and that, as a
solvent of political difficulties, it was useless.
The Macdonald-Sicotte government never survived this shock to its
pretensions. In May, 1863, J. A. Macdonald moved and Cartier
seconded a motion condemning the ministry, and it was carried by a
majority of five. "We shall not," declared the Globe, "cry our eyes
out over the defeat of the ministry, whatever the result be.... If
it is destroyed now by its enemies, we may rejoice that the
executioner's task has been taken out of our hands." But the
administration did not immediately die. Sandfield Macdonald
endeavoured to save it by a purgation, and the infusion of fresh
blood. A reorganization of the cabinet took place, with the obvious
aim of making it more acceptable to Brown and Upper Canada. Sicotte
was quietly dropped, and Dorion took his place as leader of the Lower
Canadians and partner with Macdonald. McGee, Foley, and Abbott were
gently pushed out. McGee was removed to make way for a person more
favourable in the eyes of Upper Canada, but many of the prime
minister's supporters considered his removal a serious mistake. The
_Globe_, which blessed the ministerial changes, considered that McGee
had not obtained a fair deal. To himself, the event was one of the
most painful in his public career. Of all men he was least covetous
for office as subsequent events proved, but he craved the confidence
of those with whom he acted. Sandfield Macdonald withheld such
confidence, and never adequately explained to him why he was being
removed from the ministry. The cards were shuffled behind his back.
In any case the affair was momentous, for it jostled him from the
ranks of the Reformers and henceforth he tended to direct his support
to J. A. Macdonald and Cartier.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account