In the early summer of 1863 the new Macdonald-Dorion government
appealed to the country. Lacking robust strength, its members laid
no very great emphasis upon the principles for which they stood. But
one significant pronouncement was ventured to the effect that the
ministry would consider representation by population as an open
question. This alone was sufficient to win Brown who promised to
wield his lance for the new government. The election gave Sandfield
Macdonald a majority in Upper Canada, but in the lower province his
followers were thinned to a minority. In Montreal three of the
ministers went down to defeat, Young, Holton, and Dorion. This fact
the _Globe_ attributed to the dropping of McGee. The elections
altered only slightly the political situation. The government had
not increased its voting strength, and it therefore lacked the
vitality to carry through vigorous legislation. The evil of
political deadlock remained like a running sore. Thoughtful men
still shook their heads at a hopeless situation, and those with
vision looked forward with more earnestness than ever to some great
constructive measure that would bring salvation to Canadian politics.
McGee made his departure from the ranks of reformers the occasion of
a dramatic utterance in the press. In June 1863 he wrote a public
letter to a friend, Daniel Macarow, of Kingston, proclaiming his
devotion to those principles cherished by Conservatives and
expressing his fear of democracy. He believed that the surest
antidote to the instability and rashheadedness associated with
democratic government would be the establishment of a royal prince,
and the nurturing in Canada as in England of the monarchical
principle. He was confident that a monarchy would save colonial
society from the excesses that seemed to be the natural irruptions of
democratic communities. In the light of subsequent development,
there is something a little bizarre about McGee's suggestion that a
monarch be imported to the British colonies. But in the sixties it
was not as chimerical as might now appear. The political future of
the colonies was then obscure. Popular institutions worked in such a
manner as to inspire despair in the minds of the critical. Partisan
spirit was violent in its bitterness. Political morality, seldom
very high on the American continent, was at a low ebb. The restless
spirit of self-interest, a powerful agent in promoting the
development of a new country, expressed itself in actions predatory
to the community. The outbreak of the American civil war seemed to
rock institutions throughout the continent, and accentuate the sense
of insecurity. It was natural that McGee should look abroad for some
means of bringing stability to Canadian institutions, and he was
merely following a time-worn precedent in believing that a monarchy
was a stabilizing force. All the prominent fathers of Confederation
held a similar opinion, although McGee stood alone in his plea that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account