Thomas Hariot, the Mathematician, the Philosopher and the ScholarStevens, Henry
Philosophy
Thomas Hariot, the Mathematician, the Philosopher and the Scholar
Stevens, Henry
Harriot, Thomas, 1560-1621; Hercules Club
Torporley’s manuscripts, as has been stated, have often been referred
to, and sometimes copied, but their true history and character is
explained by Hariot’sWill. There are really but two manuscripts
relating to Hariot. The more important one comprises 116
closely-written folio leaves, or 232 pages, all in Torporley’s
handwriting. It bears no title or designation. Hence various writers
who have seen it, from Collins, Wood, and Dr Zach, have given it
different names, such as, _‘Ephemeris Chysometria,’ ‘Congestor opus
Matbematicum,’_ etc. but it appears to be nothing more nor less than
Torporley’s attempt to pen out such doctrine as he found in Hariot’s
papers. The leaves are numbered, 1 to 16 containing a Treatise on
Hariot’s Theory of Numbers. Leaves 17 to 25 are tables of the divisors
of odd numbers up to 20,300. On the verso of leaf 25 the Theory of
Numbers is resumed, extending to the recto of 27. On the verso of leaf
27 begins the treatise on the properties of Triangles and ends on leaf
34. Leaves 35 to 55 comprise examples of Algebraical processes, and
leaves 56 to 116 contain Tables (probably tabulæ sinuum ?) up to 180°.
On the second leaf the Author speaks of himself as working out, or
working on Hariot’s principles, and also as making use of the writings
of Vieta. He adds:
‘And since it is our principal design to explain the improvement in
this science[the Properties of Numbers and Triangles] discovered by our
friend Thomas Hariot; but he neither completely reformed it (which
indeed was not necessary) nor gave a full account of it, but only
strengthened it where it was defective, and by treating in his own way
the points of the science which were heretofore more difficult,
rendered them clear and easy.’
This manuscript was probably intended for another printed volume of
Hariot’s mathematical works, but owing to the deaths about the same
time, 1632, of the venerable editor and the noble patron this work
never bore a definite name and never saw the light of the press.
CORRECTOR ANALYTICUS
Artis pofthumx THOMÆ HARIOTI
Vt Mathematici eximij, perraro
Vt Philofophi Audentes, frequentius errantis
Vt Hominis evanidi, infigniter
Ad
Fidedigniorem refutationem Philopfeudofophiæ
Atomifticæ;, per cum Reducis, et præ
cæteris eius Portentis
feriò
corripiendæ, anathematyzandæq
Compendiu Antimonitorfi, et Speciminale
exanthorati ia Senioris
Na: Torporley.
Vt
Noverit Arbiter Caveat Emptor.
non bene Ripæ
Creditur, ipfe Aries etiam nunc Vellera ficcat.
_Virgil, Ecl._ iii. 94,95,]
This Second Manuscript is a pretentious but small affair. It was
manifestly written at Sion College after the _Praxis_ appeared in 1631.
It is only the preface or the opening of a growl of envy or
disappointment. It shows clearly that Torporley himself was not the
editor of the Algebra or Praxis. The above is the pedantic title-page,
given line for line and verbatim.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account