Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred WitnessesRemsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
History
Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred Witnesses
Remsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809
While the orthodox clergy, with a few noble exceptions, have been,
to their overlasting shame, mainly responsible for the ignorance
and prejudice that have prevailed concerning Thomas Paine, Liberal
ministers, many of them, to their eternal honor, have braved public
sentiment and dared to do him justice. In an address more than fifty
years ago the Rev. Moncure D. Conway paid this tribute to the moral
character of Thomas Paine: "In his life, in his justice, in his truth,
in his adherence to high principles, I look in vain for a parallel in
those times and in these times. I am selecting my words. I know I am to
be held accountable for them." Rev. Theodore Parker says: "I think
he did more to promote piety and morality among men than a hundred
ministers of that age in America."
Prof. L. F. Laybarger: "Great was Thomas Paine intellectually, morally
he was greater."
Col. E. A. Stevens: "May Americans long appreciate the genius and
reverence the virtues of their noble benefactor, for he left them a
legacy greater than his works--the contemplation of his high-souled,
unselfish character."
Every person who has charged Paine with immorality has either invented
a falsehood or repeated one. The character of Paine; was as blameless as
that of Washington. Both men, in their last days, were bitterly assailed
by political enemies. With their deaths political censure, for the most
part, ceased. But Paine's religious opinions were not forgotten, and
could not be forgiven. His "Age of Reason" continued to be read, and
remained unanswered, because unanswerable. What "Common Sense" had
done to kingcraft in America the "Age of Reason" promised to do to
priestcraft throughout the world. In her desperation the church seized
her only available weapon, slander. Every inventor of a calumny against
Paine was hailed as a defender of the faith. Unscrupulous biographers
and historians, like Cheetham and McMaster, to curry favor with the
church, have recorded these calumnies as facts; and others, accepting
these writers as reliable authorities, have innocently repeated them.
Many who have acknowledged Paine's services to mankind have felt
compelled to apologize for his supposed errors. Sir Leslie Stephen, who
had accepted some of these charges, thus frankly admits that he had been
deceived: "I regret to say that I had accepted certain charges against
Paine's character, which Mr. Conway has shown to rest upon worse than
suspicious evidence.... I fully admit that I was entirely misled by a
hasty reliance upon worthless testimony." (_History of English Thought
in the Eighteenth Century, 3rd ed., vol. ii, p. 261, note._)
William H. Burr: "While the corpse of the philanthropist lay cooling in
the ground the English Tory Cheetham wrote a biography full of malignity
and detraction."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account