Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred WitnessesRemsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
History
Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred Witnesses
Remsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809
Excepting Cheetham and Chalmers, all of the biographers of
Paine--Conway, Vale, Rickman, Sedgwick, Sherwin, Blanchard, Linton and
others--have endeavored to do him justice. But Cheetham's and Chalmer's
books have been the arsenals where the orthodox of England and America
have gone for their weapons with which to attack the author of the "Age
of Reason." Not only have they tried to suppress Paine's book, they have
tried to banish from the public library and book-store every work that
has appeared in defense of it or its author. For three-quarters of a
century the only biographies of Paine to be found in the London library
were those of Cheetham and Chalmers; the only one to be found in the
public libraries of America was that of Cheetham. Is it any wonder,
then, that nearly all the pictures of Paine, even those drawn by
friendly hands, to be found in our histories, biographical dictionaries,
encyclopedias and other works, should be largely caricatures?
One of the foulest of these caricatures is that drawn by the historian
John Bach McMaster. For this writer's scurrilous attack on Paine no
excuse can be offered. The plea of ignorance of Paine's true character
and history cannot be urged in his behalf. He had before him the
authentic records of Paine's career, in America, at least. He knew
that his statements were untruthful and unjust. His tirade of abuse is
seemingly for the sole purpose of securing for his books the endorsement
of the clerical bigots who dominate our schools and colleges.
Louisa Harding: "One would imagine that even the religious bigot would
know that he [McMaster] drew for us the picture of a great man, looming
up tall and wide behind the chronicler who strove to pull him down....
In the course of a careful, impartial investigation of the various
lives of, and articles on, Paine, it became necessary to resort to
the explanation of blinding religious prejudice; and that, too, having
failed to fit the case, there seems to be no recourse save to use a
shorter, uglier word--John Bach McMaster _lies_."
A little while ago a prominent American, misled by Paine's calumniators
and too proud to retract it when the error was called to his
attention, applied to the author-hero the brutal epithet "filthy little
Atheist"--three falsehoods in three words, for Paine was neither filthy,
little, nor an Atheist.
[See the works of President Theodore Roosevelt for
this quotation of his opinion of Thomas Paine. DW]
"Every syllable of that characterization is a shameful
falsehood."--_William M. Salter, A.M._
"One of the most transparently false and indefensible slanders that ever
came from lip or pen."--_J. P. Bland, B. D._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account