Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred WitnessesRemsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
History
Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred Witnesses
Remsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809
That the Declaration of Independence is, in its entirety, the work
of Paine probably can not be proven. That he had much to do with
its composition, however, can scarcely be doubted. The circumstances
attending its adoption warrant the assumption, and the style of the
document confirms it. Knowing the marvelous power of Paine's pen,
knowing that with it he had led the people to demand independence, to
suppose that he would not be consulted, that his services would not
be solicited in regard to its preparation is incredible. Had he been a
member of the Continental Congress he certainly would have been selected
to draft the document. He was the soul of the movement and its literary
leader. The historian Gaspey says: "The Government took no steps of
importance without consulting him." The fact that his name was not
mentioned in connection with its authorship at the time argues nothing.
Had he written every word of it neither he nor the Committee could with
propriety have divulged its authorship. The authorship of state papers
and other public documents is assumed by, and credited to, the officials
issuing them and not to the persons who may have been employed to draft
them.
"There is much evidence, both internal and external, in the Declaration,
that some other person than Jefferson was the writer. There is much
evidence, internal and external, that the author was Thomas Paine."--_W.
M. van der Weyde_.
A noted writer, Albert Payson Terhune, presents the following as
the principal arguments that have been adduced in support of Paine's
authorship of the Declaration of Independence:
"The Declaration's first draft contained the phrase: 'Scotch and foreign
mercenaries.' Jefferson was fond of the Scotch, and had two Scotch
tutors; whereas Paine openly hated Scotland and its people.
"The first draft contained the word 'hath' This word is said to be found
nowhere else in Jefferson's writings, while it abounds in Paine's.
"There was also in this draft a sharp rebuke to the British king for his
introducing slavery into his provinces. Jefferson was a slave-holder;
Paine hated slavery.
"That Jefferson, an owner of slaves, should have declared 'all men to be
equal' and 'entitled to liberty,' has always seemed inconsistent.
"Though unjust taxation was one of the Revolution's chief causes,
it receives very slight mention in the Declaration. Jefferson was
supposedly a foe to such taxation. Paine considered the taxation problem
merely as a side issue.
"Paine's notions concerning government as set forth in his 'Common
Sense' are largely embodied in the Declaration.
"Jefferson's style of writing was easy and graceful. Paine's was
forceful, terse, pointed. The Declaration is couched far more in the
latter style than in the former.
"Phrases and words dear to Paine are scattered broadcast through the
document.
"The expression 'Nature and Nature's God' fit in with Paine's favorite
theory that God was to be found in Nature."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account