'And when we [of New-England] did emancipate our slaves, we were driven to the measure by the force of example; and we did not do it until it was found quite convenient; and then what provision was made for the poor blacks? Let our State Prison records answer the question. Our Southern brethren have been _more kind_: they will not emancipate them until they send them where they can enjoy _liberty_, more than in name. As a Northern man I feel it my duty, and I take pleasure in giving the _meed of praise_ to my Southern brethren.'--[Speech of Rev. Mr Gallaudet, at a colonization meeting in New-York city.] 'The slave works for his master, who feeds and clothes him, defends him from harm, and takes care of him when he is sick. The free colored man works for himself, and has nobody to take care of him but himself.' --[From a little colonization work, published in Baltimore in 1828, 'for the use of the African Schools in the United States'!! entitled 'A Voice from Africa.'] 'The slaveholder will tell you, that he did not take liberty from the African--he was a slave when he found him, and he is no more than a slave yet. The man who owns one hundred acres of land more than he can cultivate himself, is as much a slaveholder as he who owns a slave.'--[An advocate of colonization in the Richmond (Indiana) Palladium for Oct. 1, 1831.] 'I DO NOT MEAN TO SPEAK OF SLAVERY AS A SYSTEM OF CRUELTY AND OF SUFFERING. On this point I am free to say, from personal observation and occasional residences for some years at the South, there has been much misapprehension among our fellow-citizens of the North. And I rejoice to add, that _the condition of the slaves generally is such as the friends of humanity have no reason to complain of_.'--[Oration delivered at Newark, N. J. July 4th, 1831, by Gabriel P. Disosway, Esq.] 'Slavery, it is true, is an evil--a national evil. Every laudable effort to exterminate it should be encouraged. And we presume that nine-tenths of the slaveholders themselves, would rejoice at the event, could it be accomplished, of the entire freedom from the country of every person of color, and would willingly relinquish every slave in their possession. But the slaves _are_ in their possession--they are entailed upon them by their ancestors. And can they set them free, and still suffer them to remain in the country? Would this be policy? Would it be safe? No. When they can be transported to the soil from whence they were derived--by the aid of the Colonization Society, by Government, by individuals, or by any other means--then let them be emancipated, and not before.'--[Lowell (Mass.) Telegraph.]