And if the poet pleases the sense by means of the ear, the painter does
so by the eye, which is the superior sense. I will enlarge no further
on this theme save to say that if a good painter were to represent the
fury of a battle, and if the poet were to describe one, and both
representations were put before the public together, you will see
before which of the two most of the spectators will stop, to which of
the two they will pay most attention, which of the two will be the most
praised and give the greater satisfaction. Without any doubt, the
painting, being infinitely the most beautiful and useful, will please
the most. Write the name of God in some spot, and set up His image
opposite, and you will see which will be the most reverenced. While
painting embraces in itself all the forms of nature, you have nothing
save words, which are not universal, like forms. If you have the
effects of the representation, we have the representation of the
effects. Take a poet who describes the charms of a woman to her lover,
and a painter who represents her, and you will see whither nature leads
the enamoured critic. Certainly the proof should rest on the verdict
of experience. You have classed painting among the mechanical arts,
but, truly, if painters were as apt at praising their own works in
writing as you are, it would not lie under the stigma {80} of so
unhonoured an name. If you call it mechanical because it is by manual
work and that the hand represents the conception of the imagination,
you writers put down with the pen the conceptions of your mind. And if
you say that it is mechanical because it is done for money, who is more
guilty of this error--if error it can be called--than you? If you
lecture in the schools, do you not go to whomsoever rewards you most?
Do you perform any work without some pay? Although I do not say this
to blame such opinions, because all labour expects its reward; and if a
poet were to say: "I will devise with my fancy a work which shall be
pregnant with meaning," the painter can do the same, as Apelles did
when he painted The Calumny.
[Sidenote: King Matthias & the Poet]
20.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account