Another excuse which has some weight is this: "I must remain at home _to
take care of my aged parents_." So said one to Christ: "Lord, I will
follow thee, but suffer me first to go and bury my father." Jesus
answered, "Let the dead bury their dead, but go thou and preach the
Gospel." I leave to the reader to determine the precise meaning and
force of this reply of our Saviour. This much it certainly means, that
some _may_ excuse themselves from preaching to take care of their
parents, when the excuse is not valid. I will not say, that the excuse
is not sufficient in some cases; but I am inclined to think that such
cases are rare. A parent must be _very_ dependent upon a son, to be
liable to such inconvenience and suffering from his absence, as can
reasonably weigh in the balance against the claims of the hundreds of
millions of dying heathen.
But the excuse which seems to be the most valid, is this: "My going to
the heathen is out of the question, for _I have a family of children_."
This is indeed a tender point. God has given me some experience on this
subject, and I know how to appreciate the excuse. But the Saviour says,
"He that loveth son or daughter more than me, is not worthy of me." This
declaration means nothing, unless it requires us to make great
sacrifices in regard to our children. So far as we can at present see,
the world cannot be converted without great self-denial on this point.
Precisely what sacrifices are to be made in regard to children, is a
question which is not, as yet, fully determined.
But let us look at the excuse. If a minister may _stay_ at home because
he has children, may not the missionary who has children _return_ home?
A pastor has one child, and cannot go. Then may not the missionary who
has one child, come back? A pastor has six children, and cannot go. Many
missionaries have six children, shall not they return? The mere
circumstance of being already abroad cannot have much weight; and the
sacrifice of a voyage in such a question, and among a multitude of other
weighty reasons, is scarcely worth being named. If children then are an
excuse, let missionaries return. No, you say; missionaries who have
children must not return on that account. What then shall they do with
their children? Keep them, and train them up to be helpers in the work?
Let pastors then take their children into the field, and train them up
for that purpose. You certainly have hearts too noble to impose a burden
on the shoulders of others which you would not bear yourselves. Your
children would have the advantage of the children of missionaries,
having been thus far trained in a Christian land. As to future
advantages of education, they will have the same with the children now
abroad. You certainly cannot complain of equality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account