This at least is certain, that the Bushman fared no worse in the hands
of the Boer than he would have done in those of the average settlers
of any other race who go out to people and organize new countries
inhabited by aboriginal peoples. And while we, the natives of modern
Europe, are contented to leave this, the most stupendous, the most
difficult, and the most honourable of all the labours which a nation
can perform, to any hands that are willing to undertake it; while we
send out, not our wisest and best to civilize and elevate and plant
the tree of European life among simple peoples, but oftenest the most
unfit among our race--the worthless son who cannot study, and who will
not labour; the man who even in the much simpler and less important
function of a citizenship in an old established society has been a
failure--while again and again we send out these men to perform our
highest national functions it will still remain a truth, that the old
Boer fore-trekker has nothing to be ashamed of when his record as a
civilizing and elevating power is compared with ours.
We shall return later, and then shall deal at length with this question
of the relations of the European towards the original inhabitants of
South Africa, and glance at those points wherein our attitude differs
from that of the first white settlers; and we shall then glance at the
causes which have led to this difference. But, as far as the Bushman
is concerned, it may now be unqualifiedly stated that he tends to
disappear as certainly under the heel of the Englishman as that of
the fore-trekker, and only a little, if at all, slower. Neither does
it appear that our languid and more showy methods must be much more
pleasant to him than theirs--simpler and more direct.
When a primitive man wants breakfast, he takes a sheep, kneels upon it,
holds it between his legs, and cuts its throat; he skins it, and taking
a slice out of it, fries it on the coals for breakfast.
We also demand not less imperatively cutlets for our breakfast; but
we manage it another way. We procure an individual some way off to
kill the beast and another out of sight to cook it; we have a paper
frill put round the bone to disguise it, and set a pot of flowers
straight before us to look at while we eat it--but to the sheep--to the
sheep--it can make little difference which way it is eaten! We still
do our unclean work, but we do it by proxy. And it may be questioned
whether what we gain in refinement we have not lost in sincerity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account