and instantly destructive to national or individual life, morally
and physically, that therefore the whole system is not slowly but
surely so. On the other hand, is there any reason to suppose that the
emasculation and degradation of human creatures, which has always taken
place whenever a high state of material civilization has been reached,
is an absolutely inevitable concomitant of all complex material
civilization, for all time? Must the story of history for ever repeat
itself? Is it possible that the human intelligence, with its marvellous
powers of forethought and analysis, shall at some time be able so to
comprehend its own condition and to shape human life, that the benefits
of a material civilization shall be grasped, while the emasculation and
disintegration _which have always accompanied it_ shall be escaped? We
have been compelled here to insert this perfunctory note on a subject
so wide and vital that it ill lends itself to perfunctory treatment, to
avoid misconception, till later we return to deal more carefully with
this subject.)
"The Scythians," says the old Greek historian, speaking of some of
the wandering tribes who at a later date were to overrun and subvert
the ancient civilizations, "the Scythians, in regard to one of the
greatest of human matters, have struck out a path cleverer than any
I know--for when men have neither walls nor established cities, but
are all house-carriers and horsemen, living not from the plough, but
from cattle and having their dwellings in wagons--how can they be
otherwise than unattackable and impracticable to meddle with?" Like the
Scythians, our dwellers in wagons have indeed remained "impracticable
to meddle with"; and they will undoubtedly enrich, not only their
immediate descendants, but the blended South African race of the
future, with the strain of their wild nature-impregnated blood.[46]
[46] (Footnote added in 1901.) This passage was written
ten years ago, and printed as it stands five years ago.
It possibly throws some light on the success of the
Republicans in the conflict with the British Empire to-day.
* * * * *
But the old Boers were not always nomads. The course of their
wanderings took the old fore-trekkers sometimes eastward and
north-eastwards, to the more fertile parts of the Karroo, and to the
luxuriant coast lands, where pasturage and water were abundant and
permanent. Here, where after long wanderings the ox-wagon drew up
beside some strong fountain, the Boer surveying the land found it good,
and often resolved to end his wanderings for a time. He might call the
place Matjesfontein, or Jackalsfontein, or Wildekatfontein, after the
fountain he had outspanned beside and the reeds that grew beside it, or
the jackals that howled round it, or the wild cats which he had killed
among the rocks; and here he made his home.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account