Slavery may, perhaps, be best compared to the infantile disease of
measles; a complaint which so commonly attacks the young of humanity
in their infancy, and when gone through at that period leaves behind
it so few fatal marks; but which when it abnormally attacks the fully
developed adult becomes one of the most virulent and toxic of diseases,
often permanently poisoning the constitution where it does not end in
death.
It certainly cannot be said of the African Boer that he continued
to maintain this institution when he had reached a higher stage of
development than that at which other European nations have forsaken
it. Though in point of time he maintained it later than some, yet it
cannot be asserted by any one who has considered the matter that it
was more at variance with his intellectual and emotional standpoint,
and therefore more immoral, that the African Boer should have kept
slaves in South Africa seventy years ago than that the Greek of the
time of Pericles, or the Roman of Cicero's day, should have done so.
And it certainly was far less at discord with his intellectual and
moral condition than with that of the highly-cultured and enlightened
Anglo-Saxons who in America and Jamaica have continued to support and
fight for the institution within the memory of this generation. In
truth, we must allow that the full-fledged institution was less at
discord with the moral and intellectual condition of the Boer than are
to-day at variance with our own those lineal descendants of slavery,
the disabilities attaching to sex or class, which in our most civilized
societies still exist.
It is then not surprising, though much to be regretted, that two
hundred years ago the Boer sought to become, and did become, a
slave-holder.
If it be asked, "Was slavery, as carried out at the Cape, of a more
or less vindictive nature than as carried on among other civilized
nations?" the reply can only be that slavery among civilized folk is a
disease so monotonous in its symptoms that whether we study its story
as inlaid on the mud tablets of ruined Chaldean cities, or as described
in Greek or Roman literature, or view its image in such stone picture
as that which Sennacherib, King of Assyria, caused to be made (and
which to-day hangs on the walls of the British Museum for him who wills
to see); or whether, on the other hand, we examine it as described in
the nineteenth-century novel, or sit in the evening beside the old
Boer grandmother, as, with her feet on her stove, she describes the
remembrance of her far-off youth--the story is one, and its details
monotonously unvarying.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account