delivered an oration at his funeral, in competition with many others
from the university, on which account his son and successor bestowed
eighty crowns of those parts upon me; and I went away to Frankfort to
publish two books,--one _De Minimo_, and the other _De Numero, Monade,
et Figura_, etc. I stayed about six months at Frankfort, lodging in the
convent of the Carmelites,--a place assigned to me by the publisher,
who was obliged to provide me a lodging. And from Frankfort, having
been invited, as I have said, by Ser Giovanni Mocenigo, I came to
Venice seven or eight months ago, where what has since happened I have
already related. I was going anew to Frankfort to print other works
of mine, and one in particular on _The Seven Liberal Arts_, with the
intention of taking these and some other of my published works which I
approve--for some I do not approve--and of going to Rome to lay them at
the feet of his Holiness, who, I have understood, loves the virtuous,
and to put my case before him, with a view to obtain absolution from
excesses, and permission to live in the clerical garb outside of the
order.... I said I wish to present myself at the feet of his Holiness
with some of my approved works, as I have some I do not approve,
meaning by that that some of the works written by me and sent to the
press I do not approve, because in them I have spoken and discussed too
philosophically, unbecomingly, and not enough like a good Christian;
and in particular I know that in some of these works I have taught and
maintained philosophically things which ought to be attributed to the
power, wisdom, and goodness of God according to the Christian faith;
founding my doctrine on sense and reason, and not on faith. So much for
them in general; concerning particulars, I refer to the writings, for I
do not now recall a single article or particular doctrine I may have
taught, but I will reply according as I shall be questioned and as I
shall remember....
[28] “Who was a heretic” is written on the margin of the original
_procès-verbal_.
“The subject of all my books, speaking broadly, is philosophy. In all
of them I have always defined in the manner of philosophy and according
to principles and natural light, not having most concern as to what,
according to faith, ought to be believed; and I think there is nothing
in them from which it can be judged that I professedly wish to impugn
religion rather than to exalt philosophy, although I may have set forth
many impious matters based on my natural light.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account