Naturally, one of the first facts that amazed him was the monstrous
unreality in that transitional society. By the census the people of
Great Britain were rated as Christians; by their acts they seemed
little better than barbarians. What availed the Established Church, in
which livings were assigned at the pleasure of some dissolute noble,
fox-hunting parsons were given the cure of souls, and worldlings or
unbelievers rose to be bishops? Could the loudest protestations explain
the existence of great, gaunt, brutalized masses, beyond the pale of
human charity; every _horse_ sleek, well lodged, and well fed, but
innumerable _men_ dying of hunger or lodged in the almshouse? Can that
be true civilization in which the various constituents recognize no
interdependence, and only a few usurp benefits which are pernicious
unless they be free to all? Respectability, and not virtue,--that,
Carlyle declared, was John Bull’s ideal, and he opened fire upon its
chief allies, Sham and Cant. He spared no prejudices, he respected no
institutions. With sarcasm until then unknown in English, he unmasked
one artificiality after another, disclosing the cruelty or the
hypocrisy which lurked behind it, and setting over against it the true
nature of the thing it pretended to be. To interpret such conditions by
the criterion of conscience was to condemn them.
But Carlyle’s mission was not merely to destroy: he shattered error
in order that the clogged fountain of truth might once more gush
forth. Before eyes long dimmed with gazing on insincerity, he would
hold up shining patterns of sincerity; souls groping for guidance,
he would stay and comfort by precedents of strength; hearts pursuing
false idols, he would chasten by examples of truth. Men talked--and
nowhere more pragmatically than in the churches--as if God, after
having imparted his behests to a few Hebrews ages ago, had retired into
some remote empyrean, and busied himself no more with the affairs of
men. But to Carlyle the immanence of God was an ever-present reality,
manifesting itself throughout all history and in every individual
conscience, but nowise more clearly than in the careers of great men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account