Shells broken by Dytiscus, 33;
Mr. Kew on dispersal of, 130.
Shore Crab, 136.
Shore-hopper, 151.
Shrimp, 132.
_Sialis lutarius_, larva of, 177;
W. Evans on, 177;
anatomy of, 180;
pupa of, 182.
Sicarius, 158.
Simmermacher on Hydrophilus, 53.
Sirex, 82.
Sowerby, G. B., on Dytiscus, 34.
Sphaerium, 130.
Sphaeroma, 155.
Spiders, general description of, 96;
Trap-door, 97;
Hunting, 98;
Garden, 98;
Jumping, 105;
Diving, 108.
Stebbing, Rev. T. R. R., on etymology of Dytiscus, 33 _n._;
on Malacostraca, 128;
on meaning of _chelate_ and _sub-chelate_, 132 _n._;
on Amphipods, 141.
Stewart, Professor, incident of, 20.
Stilopyga, 63.
Swammerdam on Blatta, 74;
on Nepa, 89;
on Water Mites, 114;
on Woodlice, 156;
on Dytiscus larva, 158, 159.
Tailed Wasp, 82.
_Talitrus locusta_, 151;
Bate and Westwood on, 151;
Mr. Robertson on, 152.
Tanypus, larva of, 176.
Tegetmeier, Mr. W. B., on destruction of shells, 34.
Thomson, J. A., on Spiders, 100.
Trap-door Spider, 97.
Vertebrates, 28.
Wart-eater, 81.
Water Beetle, Margined, 31;
the Great, 49.
Water Boatman, 93.
Water Bugs, 86.
Water-devil, 157.
Water Mites, 113;
Swammerdam on, 114;
De Geer on, 116;
Dugès on, 117;
Mainland on, 118.
Water Scorpion, 86.
Water-tiger, 157.
Westwood on Locusta, 81.
White, Gilbert, on Blatta, 64.
Wing-cases, 41.
Wireworm, 126.
Wood, Rev. J. G., on lens stand, 15.
Woodlice, 155;
Swammerdam on, 156.
Worms, 29.
Wright, Mr. L., on microscopes, 16.
Zeiss, lenses of, 15.
THE END.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Darwin, _Descent of Man_ (2nd ed.), p. 159, note 23.
[2] The power of magnification of a lens is the ratio of its focal
distance to 10 inches. Thus a lens of 1 inch focus (or focal distance)
magnifies 10 times (written × 10, or ten diameters); one of ½ in. focal
distance, 20 times, and so on.
[3] _A Popular Handbook to the Microscope_, p. 39.
[4] _Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club_, v. 148.
[5] _Ponds and Rock Pools_, p. 17.
[6] _Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural
History_, iv. 158.
[7] ‘Dytiscus’ is written of set purpose. It is not, as some people
tell us, a miswriting for Dyticus; but a properly formed diminutive,
from the Greek _dutēs_ = a diver; like _paidiskos_ = a little boy.
Linnaeus consistently calls the genus Dytiscus from 1735 onwards.
Dyticus only dates from Geoffroy’s _Histoire Abrégée des Insectes_,
first published anonymously in 1762. On this question of nomenclature I
am glad to have the support of the Rev. T. R. R. Stebbing, F.R.S., who,
in answer to my inquiries, kindly wrote, ‘Darwin uses “Dytiscus” in the
_Origin of Species_, and I should decidedly recommend its being upheld.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account