Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875Evans, Arthur, Sir
History
Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875
Evans, Arthur, Sir
Bosnia and Herzegovina -- Description and travel; Bosnia and Herzegovina -- History -- Rebellion of 1875
During the last years of Tvartko’s reign Bosnia enjoyed the peace she
so much needed. The King who had inherited many of the good qualities,
though not perhaps the martial ardour and masterful ambition of
his father, the first Tvartko, won the hearts of his people by his
even-handed justice. He heard complaints himself, sitting in the gate,
as the Prince of Montenegro does at the present day, and decided the
cases set before him with wisdom. Before punishment could be inflicted
on anyone judgment had first to be pronounced by the Starosts or Elders
of the realm, and the verdict had first to be submitted to the approval
of the people. Business of state was conducted by the King in Council,
and his chief advisers were the Bans of Jaycze and Bosna. In Tvartko’s
days, we are told, no flatterer dare approach the Court. The Bogomiles
enjoyed toleration, and Tvartko himself and the chief barons of the
realm, including the Count of Popovo and Trebinje, the despot George of
Serbia, and Sandalj Hranić were adherents of the sect. The Franciscan
Missionaries, to whom directly or indirectly a very large share of the
troubles of the Bosnian kingdom was due, were confined to the districts
where they were already settled, and compelled to limit their exactions
to a more restricted sphere; Tvartko even profited by a quarrel that
broke out between them and the superior of their order, to place them
under his direct jurisdiction.[100]
Stephen Thomas succeeded Tvartko ‘the Just’ on the throne of Bosnia in
1443. He was an illegitimate son of Ostoja and a Ragusan lady, Voiacchia,
and was raised to the throne by the Bogomiles to whose communion he
belonged. True to the policy which prompted the Puritan population of
Bosnia to seek a counterpoise against Catholic Hungary in their fellow
Puritans, the champions of Islâm, King Stephen Thomas began his reign by
promising a yearly tribute to the Sultan. But the Papal party had rightly
reckoned on the weakness of Thomas’s character; and the subtle genius of
the Apostolic legate, Thomasini, whom the Pope had sent to effect his
conversion, knew only too well how to play upon his fears and cupidity.
Stephen Thomas was illegitimate; the lawful son of Ostoja, Radivoj (or
Gaudenzo) had returned from Turkish exile and put in a claim on the
Bosnian crown; the Papal party had powerful weapons at their command in
the Duke of St. Sava, then a staunch Catholic, who refused allegiance and
invaded Thomas’s territory, and in the King of Hungary, who as suzerain,
declined to recognize the title of a heretic prince. Thomasini offered to
legitimate Thomas and his heirs, to obtain for him a consecrated crown,
to reconcile his rivals and his suzerain. The King of Bosnia yielded,
abjured his Bogomilian heresy, and was baptized into the Catholic fold.
Thomas, who had hitherto hesitated to take the style of King in his
official acts,[101] was formally crowned in 1444. His homage was accepted
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account