Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875Evans, Arthur, Sir
History
Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875
Evans, Arthur, Sir
Bosnia and Herzegovina -- Description and travel; Bosnia and Herzegovina -- History -- Rebellion of 1875
by the Hungarian King Ladislaus, and his rival Radivoj was pacified with
the grant of the Banat of Jaycze.
In Bosnia itself this abjuration of the national faith produced the most
deplorable effects. The Inquisition raised its head, the Franciscans
were again rampant. The Bogomiles saw themselves betrayed by the King
of their own creation. The great vassal of the Bosnian crown, Stephen
Cosaccia, Duke of St. Sava, who in the first blush of Thomas’s conversion
had been induced to return to his allegiance, and whose goodwill had
been further courted by Thomas taking his daughter Catharine to wife,
now began to find it politic to cut himself adrift from the Papal party,
and to bid for complete independence of the Bosnian Crown by posing
as the protector of the Bogomiles. Meanwhile, beyond the border, the
great battle of Varna had been fought, the Hungarians routed, and their
King slain. As the danger of Turkish conquest drew nearer and nearer,
the most bigoted champions of the Roman Church might see the danger of
throwing the Protestant population into the arms of the invader; and
the most sanguine of the Christian Puritans, viewing the fate of their
brothers in Bulgaria, might shrink from accepting the dominion of their
Mahometan counterparts. In the Diet, or Great Council of the Realm,
which King Stephen Thomas assembled at Coinica, we may see a last effort
to check the growing anarchy, and unite the discordant elements of the
realm. I have given an account of the great charter of King Stephen
Thomas while describing the scene of the ‘Conventus’ of Coinica.[102]
In it the constitutional relation of the Duke of St. Sava will be found
defined, and the clause which enacts ‘that the Manichæans build no new
church nor restore the old,’ but which omits to prescribe any further
penalties or to fulminate any of the usual anathemas against them, seems
to me to imply that even the Bogomiles were to be accorded comparative
toleration.[103] But passions ran too high, anarchy was too inveterate
in Bosnia, for this attempt at internal pacification to succeed. In
the Papal legate, Thomasini, King Stephen Thomas had ever at his side
an evil genius, who inclined him more and more towards the path of
persecution. With the Turk at the door King Thomas, who was known to
the Roman Catholics as the ‘pious,’ once more lent the support of the
civil arm to the Inquisition. The Bogomiles turned for protection to the
Turks, their only possible ally, and, four years after the ‘Conventus’ of
Coinica, invited them into the country. Stephen Thomas, a tyrant towards
his own subjects, showed himself a craven before the foe, and purchased
an ignominious peace from Amurath by agreeing to pay him 25,000 ducats a
year. But the Turkish suzerainty became more and more galling, and the
fall of Constantinople in 1453 finally roused him from his lethargy.
Four years after that event he issued from his Palace of Sutisca, near
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account