Such are the main objects of interest upon the visible hemisphere of
our satellite. In observing them, the beginner will do well, after the
inevitable preliminary debauch of moon-gazing, during which he may
be permitted to range over the whole surface and observe anything
and everything, not to attempt an attack on too wide a field. Let
him rather confine his energies to the detailed study of one or two
particular formations, and to the delineation of all their features
within reach of his instrument under all aspects and illuminations.
By so doing he will learn more of the actual condition of the lunar
surface than by any amount of general and haphazard observation; and
may, indeed, render valuable service to the study of the moon.
Neither let him think that observations made with a small telescope
are now of no account, in view of the number of large instruments
employed, and of the great photographic atlases which are at present
being constructed. It has to be remembered that the famous map of
Beer and Mädler was the result of observations made with a 3-3/4-inch
telescope, and that Lohrmann used an instrument of only 4-4/5 inches,
and sometimes one of 3-1/4. Anyone who has seen the maps of these
observers will not fail to have a profound respect for the work that
can be done with very moderate means. Nor have even the beautiful
photographs of the Paris, Lick, and Yerkes Observatories superseded
as yet the work of the human eye and hand. The best of the Yerkes
photographs, taken with a 40-inch refractor, are said to show detail
'sufficiently minute to tax the powers of a 6-inch telescope.' But
this can be said only of a very few photographs; and, generally
speaking, a good 3-inch glass will show more detail than can be seen
on any but a few exceptionally good negatives.
In conducting his observations, the student should be careful to
outline his drawing on such a scale as will permit of the easy
inclusion of all the details which he can see, otherwise the sketch
will speedily become so crowded as to be indistinct and valueless. A
scale of 1 inch to about 20 miles, corresponding roughly to 100 inches
to the moon's diameter, will be found none too large in the case of
formations where much detail has to be inserted--that is to say, in
the case of the vast majority of lunar objects. Further, only such a
moderate amount of surface should be selected for representation as
can be carefully and accurately sketched in a period of not much over
an hour at most; for, though the lunar day is so much longer than our
own, yet the changes in aspect of the various formations due to the
increasing or diminishing height of the sun become very apparent if
observation be prolonged unduly; and thus different portions of the
sketch represent different angles of illumination, and the finished
drawing, though true in each separate detail, will be untrue as a
whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account