The patient, who had come to consult Professor Marie at Bicêtre in December, 1899, was presented to the Society in the first instance by M. Crouzon.[68] He entered the room with his eyes fixed on the floor, but in a few seconds they had resumed their normal position in the horizontal plane. At frequent intervals he raised them upwards, or inclined his head so as to bring the pupils into contact with the upper lids, the natural position of rest of the globes being regained by a voluntary effort after each displacement. When interrogated, he complained of not being able to distinguish objects in an area of his visual fields limited by an imaginary line drawn from his eyes to strike the ground at a point six feet in front of him; otherwise his sight was excellent. The history he gave was to the effect that five months previously, in the enjoyment of perfect mental and physical health, he had had a sudden stroke, and been unconscious for seventeen hours. No sinister results ensued till four days later, when he lost his vision, began to articulate very indistinctly, and failed to recognise his wife, continuing in that state for the next two months. Gradual recovery of speech and sight then commenced, but the habit of looking upwards persisted. The absence of injury to the visual apparatus, coupled with the presence of admitted psychical disorders, decided Crouzon in his consideration of the condition as a functional disturbance of the ocular muscles analogous to tic. In this connection the significant observation was made by Joffroy that in the recumbent position the patient's eyes assumed their ordinary place, suggesting a comparison with those dolls whose eyes open or close according as they are held vertically or horizontally. In his opinion, the eye mobility negatived any idea of contracture consequent on central lesions.