Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical settingVaeth, Joseph Anthony
History
Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical setting
Vaeth, Joseph Anthony
Martorell, Joanot, -1468. Tirant lo Blanch
Moreover, Martorell, who was to write this book, was a Catalan. Was he
as excellent a master of Portuguese as he was of his native tongue? We
have no definite information in that regard upon which we may rely.
Surely he was courageous to write such a voluminous work in Portuguese,
if he did not control that language with ease. When he drew his
material from Lull’s and from Metge’s works (see pp. 79-89), did he
translate it into Portuguese and then turn it back into Catalan without
consulting the corresponding passages in the sources? If such was
the case, there would have been a greater difference in the parallel
passages. But a man who is a master of the two languages would never
take that trouble. And why should he try to make the passages exactly
alike? Now, what was Martorell to write about? About a great hero
whose name was Tirant lo Blanch and whose deeds were so much admired
by Prince Ferdinand. But this Tirant lo Blanch is not a historical
personage, he is an imaginary individual, a literary character. If
the Catalan Tirant had not yet been written, if there was not even
such a literary character, how, then, could the Prince have become so
enthusiastic about him?
The strongest argument in favor of a Portuguese original is the fact
that de Galba states that he translated the final fourth part from
the Portuguese. But we must remember that Martorell says that he will
translate the Portuguese into Catalan, and for that reason de Galba
was obliged to say the same. But the same style, vocabulary, method
of composing the work, the point of view and characteristics of the
author are in evidence throughout the book. For this reason it may seem
that Martorell wrote the whole work in Portuguese and then translated
three-fourths of it into Catalan. He died and de Galba completed it.
But if the latter had translated the fourth part, we feel that we
should have been able to discover some differences in style, spelling
and vocabulary, and an absence of some of the favorite expressions of
Martorell. If he had composed that part we should not have had much
difficulty in detecting it. Consequently we cannot believe that _Tirant
lo Blanch_ was first written in Portuguese, and then translated into
Catalan.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account