Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical settingVaeth, Joseph Anthony
History
Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical setting
Vaeth, Joseph Anthony
Martorell, Joanot, -1468. Tirant lo Blanch
But when the wedding-ring was brought forth a feeling of distress
came over Guy, and this was caused by his love for Felice. He fell
in a swoon, and when he had recovered consciousness, he asked that
the ceremony be postponed. He was in torment for two weeks. Finally
he resolved to remain true to Felice. Now it happened that Morgadour
slew a certain lion that Guy had rescued from a dragon, and which
thereafter followed him as a faithful and grateful companion. This act
so enraged Guy that in a quarrel he killed the treacherous steward. He
then decided to leave Constantinople. When the emperor saw that it was
not in his power to retain him, he wept and all the court wept with
him. Then he brought forth his treasures and bade Guy to take whatever
might please him, but he would accept nothing. Guy’s companions,
however, were in a receptive mood, and the emperor gave them whatever
they desired. And Guy departed for England, leaving the hearts of the
emperor, the princess, and the people of Constantinople filled with woe.
For an account of Tirant’s activities while in the service of the Greek
emperor, we beg to refer the reader to the analysis. We shall, however,
call his attention to the following striking similarities between
_Tirant lo Blanch_ and _Guy of Warwick_. In both these works the empire
is described as being in desperate straits. Guy went to Constantinople
with one hundred knights; Tirant, with one hundred and forty. In both
books the only son of the emperor was slain. In the English romance,
Esclandar promised to his lady-love, the sultan’s daughter, the head
of Guy; in the Catalan work, the King of Egypt expressed his intention
of sending to his lady-love, the Grand Turk’s daughter, the head of
Tirant. Tirant addressed his soldiers on various occasions, as did Guy
before the Greeks attacked the enemy. Guy, although never formally
appointed leader of the imperial army, was intrusted with the defense
of Constantinople; Tirant was in full command of the forces of the
emperor. Morgadour cherished hopes of marrying the daughter of His
Imperial Majesty, harbored envy and ill will against Guy, and tried to
bring about his death; the Duke of Macedonia was one of Carmesina’s
suitors, hated Tirant, and treacherously attacked him from behind in
the midst of battle. In both works the bells were rung when there was
cause for rejoicing. Both Guy and Tirant were always successful in
their encounters with the enemy. In _Guy of Warwick_ and in _Tirant
lo Blanch_ the emperor gave the hand of his daughter to the hero and
publicly announced him successor to the imperial throne. But in neither
case was the marriage consummated. Guy’s perilous mission as ambassador
to the sultan is reëchoed in _Tirant lo Blanch_, but the scene takes
place in Barbary. Tirant went to King Scariano as ambassador of the
King of Tremicen, refused to salute him, for they were enemies, and
harshly rebuked him for making war against the King of Tremicen. So he
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account